Literature DB >> 9649152

A study of the feasibility and accuracy of pharmacokinetically guided etoposide dosing in children.

S P Lowis1, L Price, A D Pearson, D R Newell, M Cole.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetically guided dosing was performed in nine paediatric patients receiving etoposide. Doses on day 2 of a 2- or 3-day schedule were adapted on the basis of the day-1 area under the plasma etoposide concentration vs time curve (AUC). The day-1 AUC was estimated using a limited sampling model and the day-2 target AUC defined by the etoposide dose-AUC relationship observed in 33 children. Target AUC values (4.6-8.2 mg ml(-1) x min) were achieved with a high degree of precision and with little bias (mean error 11% and root mean squared error 15% respectively). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those reported previously in children, although interpatient pharmacokinetic variability was less than that observed previously: plasma clearance, 23 (18-26) ml min(-1) m(-2); volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss), 6.0 (3.9-8.9) l m(-2); t(1/2) 254 (127-550) min (median and range). This study has demonstrated that pharmacokinetically guided dosing with etoposide is feasible. However, pharmacokinetically guided dosing is likely to be of most benefit in patients with abnormalities of renal or hepatic function, or in children with prior exposure to cisplatin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9649152      PMCID: PMC2150379          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  22 in total

1.  Therapeutic monitoring of continuous infusion etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S P Joel; P Ellis; K O'Byrne; D Papamichael; M Hall; R Penson; S Nicholls; C O'Donnell; A Constantinou; J Woodhull; M Nicholson; I Smith; D Talbot; M Slevin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Etoposide admixed with cisplatin. Phase I clinical investigation of 72-hour infusion.

Authors:  J Lokich; N Anderson; M Bern; S Wallach; C Moore; D Williams
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A program package for simulation and parameter estimation in pharmacokinetic systems.

Authors:  D Z D'Argenio; A Schumitzky
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1979-03

4.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-08

5.  Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213). Correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters to clinical and biochemical data from patients receiving etoposide.

Authors:  K H Pflüger; L Schmidt; M Merkel; H Jungclas; K Havemann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Phase I study of VP-16-213 (Etoposide) administered as a continuous 5-day infusion.

Authors:  J Lokich; J Corkery
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct

7.  A phase I trial of continuous infusion VP16-213 (etoposide).

Authors:  J Aisner; D A Van Echo; M Whitacre; P H Wiernik
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Steady-state levels and bone marrow toxicity of etoposide in children and infants: does etoposide require age-dependent dose calculation?

Authors:  J Boos; S Krümpelmann; P Schulze-Westhoff; T Euting; F Berthold; H Jürgens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of 72-hour continuous infusion of etoposide in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  C L Bennett; J A Sinkule; R L Schilsky; E Senekjian; K E Choi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Etoposide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after acute and chronic exposure to cisplatin.

Authors:  M V Relling; H L McLeod; L C Bowman; V M Santana
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Chemotherapy individualization.

Authors:  Gareth J Veal; Sally A Coulthard; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Oral treatment with etoposide in small cell lung cancer - dilemmas and solutions.

Authors:  Renata Rezonja; Lea Knez; Tanja Cufer; Ales Mrhar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.991

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.