Literature DB >> 3621455

Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213). Correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters to clinical and biochemical data from patients receiving etoposide.

K H Pflüger, L Schmidt, M Merkel, H Jungclas, K Havemann.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic parameters established in 15 patients receiving parenterally administered etoposide (80-120 mg . m-2) are reported. The etoposide assay by means of mass spectrometry after sample separation by thin-layer chromatography or high-pressure liquid chromatography used in this study has been described elsewhere. Peak plasma levels (9.5-63.3 micrograms . ml-1), the area under the curve (AUC) (2707-10192 micrograms . ml-1 . min-1), the mean transit time MTT (2.7-10.6 h), etoposide half-lives t1/2 alpha (0.10-0.52 h) and t1/2 beta (2.18-8.17 h), the volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) (2.5-15.1 . l/m-2) and the systemic clearance (Cls) (10.1-35.1 ml min-1 . m-2) with the resulting mean values and standard deviations were determined. Our findings are compared with those of other authors, especially with regard to the method of detection used. This comparison indicates similar individual deviations and shorter half-lives with increasing specificity of the employed assay. Four patients studied on 3 consecutive days and, in one instance, during two different cycles of chemotherapy showed no sign of accumulation or of accelerated excretion of etoposide. There was little intrapatient variability. The pharmacokinetic parameters were correlated to clinical and laboratory findings. Statistical analysis indicated that the AUC was increased by prior cisplatin therapy and in patients with elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase. The Cls was decreased by prior cisplatin therapy, in obese patients, and by elevated alkaline phosphatase. The t1/2 beta of etoposide was increased in older patients. Linear regression analysis yielded a greater Vdss in patients with lower serum albumin levels, but this correlation has not yet been found to be statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3621455     DOI: 10.1007/bf00252961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of the human pharmacokinetics of VM-26 and VP-16, two antineoplastic epipodophyllotixin glucopyranoside derivatives.

Authors:  L M Allen; P J Creaven
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213). I. A combined method of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  H Danigel; K H Pflüger; H Jungclas; L Schmidt; J Dellbrügge
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  The clinical pharmacology of VM26 and VP16-213. A brief overview.

Authors:  P J Creaven
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Variable bioavailability following repeated oral doses of etoposide.

Authors:  V J Harvey; M L Slevin; S P Joel; M M Smythe; A Johnston; P F Wrigley
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-11

5.  Plasma assay for the antineoplastic agent VP 16-213 (etoposide) using high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.

Authors:  J J Holthuis; F M Römkens; H M Pinedo; W J van Oort
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.935

6.  Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of etoposide (VP-16).

Authors:  R D Smyth; M Pfeffer; A Scalzo; R L Comis
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Teniposide (VM26) disposition in children with leukemia.

Authors:  J A Sinkule; C F Stewart; W R Crom; E T Melton; G V Dahl; W E Evans
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Penetration of VP-16 (etoposide) into human intracerebral and extracerebral tumors.

Authors:  D J Stewart; M T Richard; H Hugenholtz; J M Dennery; R Belanger; J Gerin-Lajoie; V Montpetit; D Nundy; J Prior; H S Hopkins
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Pharmacokinetics of teniposide in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M D'Incalci; C Rossi; C Sessa; R Urso; M Zucchetti; P Farina; C Mangioni
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-01

10.  The effect of food and concurrent chemotherapy on the bioavailability of oral etoposide.

Authors:  V J Harvey; M L Slevin; S P Joel; A Johnston; P F Wrigley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Carboplatin and etoposide pharmacokinetics in patients with testicular teratoma.

Authors:  D R Newell; R A Eeles; L A Gumbrell; F E Boxall; A Horwich; A H Calvert
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of cancer chemotherapy. Effect on outcomes.

Authors:  E Masson; W C Zamboni
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Pharmacokinetics of high-dose etoposide after short-term infusion.

Authors:  P Köhl; H Köppler; L Schmidt; H W Fritsch; J Holz; K H Pflüger; H Jungclas
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Pharmacokinetics of etoposide: correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters with clinical conditions.

Authors:  K H Pflüger; M Hahn; J B Holz; L Schmidt; P Köhl; H W Fritsch; H Jungclas; K Havemann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  Antineoplastic agents. Drug interactions of clinical significance.

Authors:  E van Meerten; J Verweij; J H Schellens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Millward; D R Newell; K Yuen; J P Matthews; K Balmanno; C J Charlton; L Gumbrell; M J Lind; F Chapman; M Proctor
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Instability of the anticancer agent etoposide under in vitro culture conditions.

Authors:  R M Mader; G G Steger; K Moser; H Rainer; P Krenmayr; C Dittrich
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.