Literature DB >> 8656259

Therapeutic monitoring of continuous infusion etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

S P Joel1, P Ellis, K O'Byrne, D Papamichael, M Hall, R Penson, S Nicholls, C O'Donnell, A Constantinou, J Woodhull, M Nicholson, I Smith, D Talbot, M Slevin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of therapeutic monitoring of etoposide at different plasma concentrations of the drug, and the resulting pharmacodynamic effects of such an approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients received single-agent etoposide every 3 weeks by continuous infusion over 5 days. Plasma etoposide concentrations were monitored 18 and 66 hours into the infusion to permit dose modification. The first cohort of 15 patients began treatment with etoposide 2 micrograms/mL, with dose escalation to 3 micrograms/mL for cycles 3 and 4 and 4 micrograms/mL for cycles 5 and 6, toxicity permitting. The second cohort of 34 patients commenced at 3 micrograms/mL, with dose escalation to 4 and 5 micrograms/mL on cycles 3 and 5, respectively.
RESULTS: Mean plasma etoposide concentration during the first treatment cycle was 93.4% +/- 26.6% of the target level at 18 hours (57% of patients within +/- 20% of the target) and 98.9% +/- 14.5% of the target level at 66 hours (82% of patients within +/- 20%). Hematologic toxicity was more pronounced in those treated with 3 micrograms/mL versus 2 micrograms/mL (median nadir neutrophil count, 1.3 v 2.6 x 10(9)/L, P = .032). Tumor responses, typically documented by the third cycle, were similar in each cohort (71% in patients commenced at 2 micrograms/mL and 70% at 3 micrograms/mL). Treatment cohort was not independently predictive of survival.
CONCLUSION: Therapeutic monitoring of infusional etoposide is feasible and dramatically reduces interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Although this was a small nonrandomized trial, the observation of different hematologic toxicity at the two starting concentrations but similar antitumor activity further suggests that these effects may be associated with different plasma etoposide concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8656259     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Intra-arterial cisplatin plus oral etoposide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: a phase II study.

Authors:  L S Ashby; W R Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Recent developments in the clinical pharmacology of classical cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Randomized cross-over clinical trial to study potential pharmacokinetic interactions between cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide.

Authors:  Huw D Thomas; David J Porter; Imke Bartelink; Joy R Nobbs; Michael Cole; Suzie Elliott; David R Newell; A Hilary Calvert; Martin Highley; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide.

Authors:  G Toffoli; G Corona; R Sorio; I Robieux; B Basso; A M Colussi; M Boiocchi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Chemotherapy individualization.

Authors:  Gareth J Veal; Sally A Coulthard; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 8.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Pharmacokinetically guided phase I trial of topotecan and etoposide phosphate in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  N C Levitt; D J Propper; S Madhusudan; J P Braybrooke; C Echeta; R Te Poele; S L Davies; E Flanagan; I D Hickson; S Joel; T S Ganesan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A study of the feasibility and accuracy of pharmacokinetically guided etoposide dosing in children.

Authors:  S P Lowis; L Price; A D Pearson; D R Newell; M Cole
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.