Literature DB >> 9647054

Minimally invasive valve operations.

D M Cosgrove1, J F Sabik, J L Navia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To reduce the morbidity from valvular heart operations, a right parasternal approach was introduced. We report our initial experience with the procedure.
METHODS: From January 1996 through July 1996, 115 patients underwent primary isolated valve procedures. One hundred (85%) patients underwent the operation through a right parasternal incision.
RESULTS: There was one hospital death secondary to a stroke on the fifth postoperative day. Three patients (two with aortic valve operations and one having a mitral valve procedure) required conversion to sternotomy. Mean aortic occlusion time was 71 minutes; mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 93 minutes. Mean stay in the intensive care unit was 27 hours and mean hospital postoperative stay was 5.7 days. Seventy-seven percent of the patients did not receive blood transfusions. Comparison with median sternotomy demonstrated a reduction in both postoperative length of stay and direct hospital costs.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that this minimally invasive approach is safe for a variety of valve procedures and is effective in reducing surgical trauma and cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9647054     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00300-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  55 in total

Review 1.  Is minimally invasive heart valve surgery a paradigm for the future?

Authors:  A M Gillinov; M K Banbury; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Manubrium-sparing median sternotomy as a uniform approach for cardiac operations.

Authors:  J B Choi; H W Yang; J O Han; S H Choi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

3.  Evolving techniques for mitral valve reconstruction.

Authors:  Aubrey C Galloway; Eugene A Grossi; Costas S Bizekis; Greg Ribakove; Patricia Ursomanno; Julie Delianides; F Gregory Baumann; Frank C Spencer; Stephen B Colvin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results.

Authors:  Tomislav Mihaljevic; Lawrence H Cohn; Daniel Unic; Sary F Aranki; Gregory S Couper; John G Byrne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience.

Authors:  Douglas R Johnston; Eric E Roselli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

7.  Real-time interactive MRI-guided cardiac surgery: aortic valve replacement using a direct apical approach.

Authors:  Elliot R McVeigh; Michael A Guttman; Robert J Lederman; Ming Li; Ozgur Kocaturk; Timothy Hunt; Shawn Kozlov; Keith A Horvath
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Robotic mitral valve repair for all categories of leaflet prolapse: improving patient appeal and advancing standard of care.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Harold M Burkhart; Kent H Rehfeldt; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Richard C Daly; Eric E Williamson; Zhuo Li; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 9.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: current status.

Authors:  Lawrence H Cohn; John G Byrne
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

Review 10.  Video-atlas on minimally invasive mitral valve surgery-The David Adams technique.

Authors:  Javier G Castillo; Federico Milla; Anelechi C Anyanwu; David H Adams
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.