Literature DB >> 21757782

Robotic mitral valve repair for all categories of leaflet prolapse: improving patient appeal and advancing standard of care.

Rakesh M Suri1, Harold M Burkhart, Kent H Rehfeldt, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Richard C Daly, Eric E Williamson, Zhuo Li, Hartzell V Schaff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the early outcomes of robotic mitral valve (MV) repair using standard open techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 100 patients with severe mitral regurgitation due to leaflet prolapse who underwent robot-assisted MV repair using conventional open-repair techniques between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 53.9 years; 77 patients (77%) were male. Fifty-nine patients (59%) had posterior leaflet prolapse, 38 (38%) had bileaflet disease, and 3 (3%) had isolated anterior leaflet prolapse. Median cross-clamp and bypass times decreased significantly during the course of the study (P<.001). Median postoperative ventilation time was 0 hours for the last 25 patients, with most patients extubated in the operating room. No deaths occurred. Reexploration for postoperative bleeding occurred in 1 patient (1%); 3 patients (3%) required percutaneous coronary intervention. Median hospital stay was 3 days. One patient (1%) underwent mitral reoperation for annuloplasty band dehiscence. Residual regurgitation was mild or less in all patients at dismissal and 1 month postoperatively. Significant reverse remodeling occurred by 1 month, including decreased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (-7.2 mm; P<.001) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-61.0 mL;P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted MV repair using proven, conventional open-repair techniques is reproducible and safe and hastens recovery for all categories of leaflet prolapse. One month after surgery, significant regression in left ventricular size and volume is evident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21757782      PMCID: PMC3258002          DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  27 in total

1.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients.

Authors:  Eugene A Grossi; Aubrey C Galloway; Angelo LaPietra; Greg H Ribakove; Patricia Ursomanno; Julie Delianides; Alfred T Culliford; Costas Bizekis; Rick A Esposito; F Gregory Baumann; Marc S Kanchuger; Stephen B Colvin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve surgery: a 12-year, 2-center experience in 1178 patients.

Authors:  Paul Modi; Evelio Rodriguez; W Clark Hargrove; Ansar Hassan; Wilson Y Szeto; W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Early surgery is recommended for mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Results of mitral valve annuloplasty with a standard-sized posterior band: is measuring important?

Authors:  Morgan L Brown; Hartzell V Schaff; Zhuo Li; Rakesh M Suri; Richard C Daly; Thomas A Orszulak
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Five years of less invasive mitral valve surgery: from experimental to routine approach.

Authors:  Joerg-Friedrich Onnasch; Felix Schneider; Volkmar Falk; Marco Mierzwa; Jan Bucerius; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.676

6.  Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson; Fernando A Atik; Delos M Cosgrove; Eugene H Blackstone; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Gita Krishnaswamy; Ung Jin; A Marc Gillinov; Brian Griffin; José L Navia; Tomislav Mihaljevic; Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Is the anterior intertrigonal distance increased in patients with mitral regurgitation due to leaflet prolapse?

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Jasmine Grewal; Sunil Mankad; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Fletcher A Miller; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

Authors:  James S Gammie; Shubin Sheng; Bartley P Griffith; Eric D Peterson; J Scott Rankin; Sean M O'Brien; James M Brown
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Recovery of left ventricular function after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Hartzell V Schaff; Joseph A Dearani; Thoralf M Sundt; Richard C Daly; Charles J Mullany; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Thomas A Orszulak
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Is robotic mitral valve repair a reproducible approach?

Authors:  Wen Cheng; Gregory P Fontana; Michele A De Robertis; James Mirocha; Lawrence S C Czer; Robert M Kass; Alfredo Trento
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Optimizing outcomes of robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse anatomy: the Suri-Burkhart technique.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Harold M Burkhart
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

3.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic repair of the mitral valve.

Authors:  Alfredo Trento
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Complex robotic correction for complex degenerative mitral valve disease.

Authors:  Danny Ramzy; Joshua Chung; Wen Cheng; Michele A De Robertis; James Mirocha; Alfredo Trento
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-01

5.  Value of robotically assisted surgery for mitral valve disease.

Authors:  Tomislav Mihaljevic; Marijan Koprivanac; Marta Kelava; Avi Goodman; Craig Jarrett; Sarah J Williams; A Marc Gillinov; Gurjyot Bajwa; Stephanie L Mick; Johannes Bonatti; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 6.  Videoscope-assisted cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Kuan-Ming Chiu; Robert Jeen-Chen Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Technical aspects of robotic posterior mitral valve leaflet repair.

Authors:  Hoda Javadikasgari; Rakesh M Suri; Tomislav Mihaljevic; Stephanie Mick; A Marc Gillinov
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

8.  Robotic surgery is the optimal approach for mitral surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Ashleigh L Clark; Rakesh M Suri
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

Review 9.  Robotic mitral valve surgery: overview, methodology, results, and perspective.

Authors:  W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

10.  How has robotic repair changed the landscape of mitral valve surgery?

Authors:  Amit K Taggarse; Rakesh M Suri; Richard C Daly
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.