Literature DB >> 15319724

One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results.

Tomislav Mihaljevic1, Lawrence H Cohn, Daniel Unic, Sary F Aranki, Gregory S Couper, John G Byrne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the potential benefits of minimally invasive approaches for treatment of isolated aortic and mitral valve disease.
METHODS: From 7/96 to 04/03, we performed 1000 minimally invasive valve operations: 526 aortic (AV) procedures (64 years; mean, 25-95) and 474 mitral (MV) procedures (58 years; mean, 17-90).
RESULTS: In the AV group, an upper ministernotomy was used in 492/526 patients (93%) and a right parasternal approach in 34 (7%). Sixty-three patients had reoperative aortic valve replacements. In the MV group lower sternotomy was used in 260/474 (55%), right parasternal in 200/474 (42%), and a right thoracotomy in 14 patients. MV repair was performed in 416 and MV replacement in 58 patients. Operative mortality was 12/526 (2%) in the AV and 1/474 (0.2%) in the MV group. Freedom from reoperation at 6 years was 99% and 95% in the AV and MV group, respectively. Late mortality was 5% in the AV and 3% in the MV group, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive valve surgery can be performed at very low levels of morbidity and mortality, with results equal to or better than conventional techniques. All forms of valve repair and replacement operations can be performed. Long-term survival and freedom from reoperation are excellent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15319724      PMCID: PMC1356443          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137141.55267.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  14 in total

1.  Reoperative aortic valve replacement: partial upper hemisternotomy versus conventional full sternotomy.

Authors:  J G Byrne; S F Aranki; G S Couper; D H Adams; E N Allred; L H Cohn
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Less invasive aortic valve surgery: rationale and technique.

Authors:  L K von Segesser; S Westaby; J Pomar; D Loisance; P Groscurth; M Turina
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 3.  Minimally invasive valve surgery: trends for the future.

Authors:  W R Chitwood
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients.

Authors:  Eugene A Grossi; Aubrey C Galloway; Angelo LaPietra; Greg H Ribakove; Patricia Ursomanno; Julie Delianides; Alfred T Culliford; Costas Bizekis; Rick A Esposito; F Gregory Baumann; Marc S Kanchuger; Stephen B Colvin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Minimally invasive valve operations.

Authors:  D M Cosgrove; J F Sabik; J L Navia
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Massimo Bonacchi; Edvin Prifti; Gabriele Giunti; Giacomo Frati; Guido Sani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery.

Authors:  T Walther; V Falk; S Metz; A Diegeler; R Battellini; R Autschbach; F W Mohr
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Minimally invasive mitral valve operations.

Authors:  J L Navia; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair.

Authors:  L H Cohn; D H Adams; G S Couper; D P Bichell; D M Rosborough; S P Sears; S F Aranki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Aortic valve surgery after previous coronary artery bypass grafting with functioning internal mammary artery grafts.

Authors:  John G Byrne; Alexandros N Karavas; Farzan Filsoufi; Tomislav Mihaljevic; Lishan Aklog; David H Adams; Lawrence H Cohn; Sary F Aranki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  [Transcatheter aortic valve implantation : what do anesthetists need to know?].

Authors:  C Riediger; F Nietlispach; F Rüter; J Fassl
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Evolution of the concept and practice of mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Lawrence H Cohn; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili; Taufiek K Rajab
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07

4.  Minimally invasive valve sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure) is safe.

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha; Heike Krueger; Julia Umminger; Nurbol Koigeldiyev; Erik Beckmann; Axel Haverich; Andreas Martens
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

5.  Real-time interactive MRI-guided cardiac surgery: aortic valve replacement using a direct apical approach.

Authors:  Elliot R McVeigh; Michael A Guttman; Robert J Lederman; Ming Li; Ozgur Kocaturk; Timothy Hunt; Shawn Kozlov; Keith A Horvath
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Is a minimally invasive approach for re-operative aortic valve replacement superior to standard full resternotomy?

Authors:  Andrés M Pineda; Orlando Santana; Gervasio A Lamas; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-07

7.  "Branch-first" continuous perfusion aortic arch replacement and its role in intra-operative cerebral protection.

Authors:  George Matalanis; Sean D Galvin
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03

Review 8.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery through lower half sternotomy.

Authors:  James R Fenton; John R Doty
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: late conversion to full sternotomy doubles operative time.

Authors:  Signe Foghsgaard; Thomas Andersen Schmidt; Henrik K Kjaergard
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

10.  Is minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery the new benchmark for treating mitral valve disease?

Authors:  Andrew B Goldstone; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.