Literature DB >> 963130

Critical bands and filter characteristics in the ear of the housemouse (Mus musculus).

G Ehret.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1976        PMID： 963130     DOI： 10.1007/BF00365592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN： 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  The measurement of critical masking bands.

Authors:  R H Margolis; A M Small
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1975-09

2.  Masked hearing thresholds of ringed seals.

Authors:  J M Terhune; K Ronald
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  AUDITORY MASKING IN THE RAT.

Authors:  G GOUREVITCH
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Complex sounds and critical bands.

Authors:  B SCHARF
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1961-05       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Comparison of critical ratios and critical bands in the monaural chinchilla.

Authors:  W H Seaton; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Age-dependent hearing loss in normal hearing mice.

Authors:  G Ehret
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1974-11

7.  Auditory filter shape.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Masked tonal thresholds in the bottlenosed porpoise.

Authors:  C S Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Development of absolute auditory thresholds in the house mouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  G Ehret
Journal:  J Am Audiol Soc       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr
  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Time course of embryonic midbrain and thalamic auditory connection development in mice as revealed by carbocyanine dye tracing.

Authors:  Bina Gurung; Bernd Fritzsch
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Critical bands and critical ratios in animal psychoacoustics: an example using chinchilla data.

Authors:  William A Yost; William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mice and humans perceive multiharmonic communication sounds in the same way.

Authors:  Günter Ehret; Sabine Riecke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparative psychoacoustics: perspectives of peripheral sound analysis in mammals.

Authors:  G Ehret
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1977-09

5.  Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.

Authors:  Livia de Hoz; Israel Nelken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Rodent auditory perception: Critical band limitations and plasticity.

Authors:  J King; M Insanally; M Jin; A R O Martins; J A D'amour; R C Froemke
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Margit E Dylla; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm.

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Holger Dierker; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-10

9.  Time-critical integration of formants for perception of communication calls in mice.

Authors:  Diana B Geissler; Günter Ehret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The effects of Eph-ephrin mutations on pre-pulse inhibition in mice.

Authors:  Andrea Liuzzo; Lincoln Gray; Matthew Wallace; Mark Gabriele
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.