Literature DB >> 19763691

Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm.

Karin B Klink1, Holger Dierker, Rainer Beutelmann, Georg M Klump.   

Abstract

Comodulation masking release (CMR) has been attributed to auditory processing within one auditory channel (within-channel cues) and/or across several auditory channels (across-channel cues). The present flanking-band (FB) experiment-using a 25-Hz-wide on-frequency noise masker (OFM) centered at the signal frequency of 10 kHz and a single 25-Hz-wide noise FB-was designed to separate the amount of CMR due to within- and across-channel cues and to investigate the role of temporal cues on the size of within-channel CMR. The results demonstrated within-channel CMR in the Naval Medical Research Institute mouse, while no unambiguous evidence could be found for CMR occurring due to across-channel processing (i.e., "true CMR"). The amount of within-channel CMR was dependent on the frequency separation between the FB and the OFM. CMR increased from 4 to 6 dB for a frequency separation of 1 kHz to 18 dB for a frequency separation of 100 Hz. The large increase for a frequency separation of 100 Hz is likely to be due to the exploitation of changes in the temporal pattern of the stimulus upon the addition of the signal. Temporal interaction between both masker bands results in modulations with a large depth at a modulation frequency equal to the beating rate. Adding a signal to the maskers reduces the depth of the modulation. The auditory system of mice might be able to use the change in modulation depth at a beating frequency of 100 Hz as a cue for signal detection, while being unable to detect changes in modulation depth at high modulation frequencies. These results are consistent with other experiments and model predictions for CMR in humans which suggested that the main contribution to the CMR effect stems from processing of within-channel cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19763691      PMCID: PMC2820211          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0186-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  25 in total

1.  Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model.

Authors:  J L Verhey; T Dau; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Monaural masking release in random-phase and low-noise noise.

Authors:  D A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

4.  Modeling comodulation masking release using an equalization-cancellation mechanism.

Authors:  Tobias Piechowiak; Stephan D Ewert; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Critical bands and filter characteristics in the ear of the housemouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  G Ehret
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1976-09-16       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  Michael L Dent; Georg M Klump; Christian Schwenzfeier
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Age-dependent hearing loss in normal hearing mice.

Authors:  G Ehret
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1974-11

8.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparison of responses of neurons in the mouse inferior colliculus to current injections, tones of different durations, and sinusoidal amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  M L Tan; J G G Borst
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  7 in total

1.  Masking release in temporally fluctuating noise depends on comodulation and overall level in Cope's gray treefrog.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Alejandro Vélez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comodulation masking release in the inferior colliculus by combined signal enhancement and masker reduction.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Diepenbrock; Marcus Jeschke; Frank W Ohl; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Masking release for sweeping masker components with correlated envelopes.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Hendrike Klein-Hennig; Bastian Epp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-28

4.  Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.

Authors:  Livia de Hoz; Israel Nelken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Target-specific IPSC kinetics promote temporal processing in auditory parallel pathways.

Authors:  Ruili Xie; Paul B Manis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Wide sensory filters underlie performance in memory-based discrimination and generalization.

Authors:  Chi Chen; Dilja Krueger-Burg; Livia de Hoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comodulation Enhances Signal Detection via Priming of Auditory Cortical Circuits.

Authors:  Joseph Sollini; Paul Chadderton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.