Literature DB >> 12070345

Time-critical integration of formants for perception of communication calls in mice.

Diana B Geissler1, Günter Ehret.   

Abstract

Brain mechanisms in humans group together acoustical frequency components both in the spectral and temporal domain, which leads to the perception of auditory objects and of streams of sound events that are of biological and communicative significance. At the perceptual level, behavioral data on mammals that clearly support the presence of common concepts for processing species-specific communication sounds are unavailable. Here, we synthesize 17 models of mouse pup wriggling calls, present them in sequences of four calls to the pups' mothers in a natural communication situation, and record the maternal response behavior. We show that the biological significance of a call sequence depends on grouping together three predominant frequency components (formants) to an acoustic object within a critical time window of about 30-ms lead or lag time of the first formant. Longer lead or lag times significantly reduce the maternal responsiveness. Central inhibition seems to be responsible for setting this time window, which is also found in numerous perceptual studies in humans. Further, a minimum of 100-ms simultaneous presence of the three formants is necessary for occurrence of response behavior. As in humans, onset-time asynchronies of formants and formant durations interact nonlinearly to influence the adequate perception of a stream of sounds. Together, these data point to common rules for time-critical spectral integration, perception of acoustical objects, and auditory streaming (perception of an acoustical Gestalt) in mice and humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12070345      PMCID: PMC124416          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.122606499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  53 in total

1.  Frequency organization and responses to complex sounds in the medial geniculate body of the mustached bat.

Authors:  J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Multiple combination-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

Authors:  H Misawa; N Suga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Neural correlates of auditory stream segregation in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey.

Authors:  Y I Fishman; D H Reser; J C Arezzo; M Steinschneider
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Sequence sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  M Brosch; C E Schreiner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Duration tuning in the mouse auditory midbrain.

Authors:  A Brand; R Urban; B Grothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; J D Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Mice and humans perceive multiharmonic communication sounds in the same way.

Authors:  Günter Ehret; Sabine Riecke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  On the dissociation of spectral and temporal cues to the voicing distinction in initial stop consonants.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; M Haggard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Just noticeable differences for segment duration in natural speech.

Authors:  A W Huggins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spectral contrasts underlying auditory stream segregation in goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-09
View more
  19 in total

1.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Sound rhythms are encoded by postinhibitory rebound spiking in the superior paraolivary nucleus.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Anders Fridberger; Sara Leijon; Albert S Berrebi; Anna K Magnusson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spectral preferences and the role of spatial coherence in simultaneous integration in gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 4.  Translating mouse vocalizations: prosody and frequency modulation.

Authors:  G P Lahvis; E Alleva; M L Scattoni
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  Duration discrimination in the mouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Grouping in auditory temporal perception and vocal production is mutually adapted: the case of wriggling calls of mice.

Authors:  Simone Gaub; Günter Ehret
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Storing maternal memories: hypothesizing an interaction of experience and estrogen on sensory cortical plasticity to learn infant cues.

Authors:  Sunayana B Banerjee; Robert C Liu
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 8.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Excitatory, inhibitory and facilitatory frequency response areas in the inferior colliculus of hearing impaired mice.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Kasen K Riemersma
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.