Literature DB >> 7817795

Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.

H K Genant1, S Grampp, C C Glüer, K G Faulkner, M Jergas, K Engelke, S Hagiwara, C Van Kuijk.   

Abstract

The comparison of patient data among different dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners is complicated because no universally accepted cross-calibration procedure or standard currently exists. This study was performed under the auspices of the International DXA Standardization Committee to establish appropriate cross-calibration parameters. Posteroanterior (PA) lumbar spine measurements of 100 women, ages 20-80 years (mean 52.6 +/- 16, range of BMD = 0.4-1.6 g/cm2) were obtained on a Norland XR26 Mark II, a Lunar DPX-L, and a Hologic QDR 2000 densitometer using standard procedures (pencil beam mode for all three scanners). Area, BMC, and BMD results from the different scanners were compared for all patients. In addition, the European spine phantom (ESP) and the European spine phantom prototype (ESP prototype), as well as standard phantoms from all three manufacturers, were evaluated on the three systems. To achieve universal scanner calibration, we used the intercept and slope of the patient's correlations and the value of the middle vertebra of the ESP as a reference point in a series of standardization formulas, and we have expressed the results as sBMD (mg/cm2). The correlations of the patients' spinal BMD values were excellent for each of the three scanner pairs. The average absolute difference in patient spinal BMD values (L2-4) between Hologic and Norland was 0.012 g/cm2 (1.3%); it was 0.113 g/cm2 (11.7%) between Hologic and Lunar and 0.118 g/cm2 (12.2%) between Norland and Lunar. The phantoms' regression lines approximated those of the patient regression lines, and the phantoms with only one measurement point were very close to the patients' regression lines. After applying the standardization formulas, the average absolute differences for the 100 patients were 28 mg/cm2 (2.7%) for Hologic/Norland, 23 mg/cm2 (2.2%) for Hologic/Lunar, and 29 mg/cm2 (2.8%) for Norland/Lunar. Average BMD results for the patients before correction were 0.972 mg/cm2 for Hologic, 1.100 g/cm2 for Lunar, and 0.969 g/cm2 for Norland. After correction, sBMD results for patients were 1045 mg/cm2 for Hologic, 1047 mg/cm2 for Lunar, and 1043 mg/cm2 for Norland. The standardization approach as performed in our study provided compatibility of DXA results obtained on different scanners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7817795     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650091002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  128 in total

Review 1.  An update on the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.

Authors:  Klaas P Staal; Jan C Roos; Radu A Manoliu; Piet J Kostense; Paul Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  A genome-wide linkage scan for bone mineral density in an extended sample: evidence for linkage on 11q23 and Xq27.

Authors:  H Shen; Y-Y Zhang; J-R Long; F-H Xu; Y-Z Liu; P Xiao; L-J Zhao; D-H Xiong; Y-J Liu; V Dvornyk; S Rocha-Sanchez; P-Y Liu; J-L Li; T Conway; K M Davies; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  International variation in proximal femur bone mineral density.

Authors:  M A Paggiosi; C C Glueer; C Roux; D M Reid; D Felsenberg; R Barkmann; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Normative bone mineral density z-scores for Canadians aged 16 to 24 years: the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Lisa Langsetmo; Claudie Berger; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou; George Ioannidis; Colin Webber; Stephanie A Atkinson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Jacques P Brown; David A Hanley; Robert Josse; Nancy Kreiger; Jerilynn Prior; Stephanie Kaiser; Susan Kirkland; David Goltzman; Kenneth Shawn Davison
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Generalized bone loss as a predictor of three-year radiographic damage in African American patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; David T Redden; Gerald McGwin; Leigh F Callahan; Edwin A Smith; Graciela S Alarcón; Larry W Moreland; Désirée M van der Heijde; Elizabeth E Brown; Donna K Arnett; Ted R Mikuls; S Louis Bridges
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-08

7.  Adolescent diet and subsequent serum hormones, breast density, and bone mineral density in young women: results of the Dietary Intervention Study in Children follow-up study.

Authors:  Joanne F Dorgan; Lea Liu; Catherine Klifa; Nola Hylton; John A Shepherd; Frank Z Stanczyk; Linda G Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; Victor J Stevens; Alan Robson; Peter O Kwiterovich; Norman L Lasser; John H Himes; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Andrea Kriska; Elizabeth H Ruder; Carolyn Y Fang; Bruce A Barton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Depressive symptomatology and fracture risk in community-dwelling older men and women.

Authors:  Heather E Whitson; Linda Sanders; Carl F Pieper; Deborah T Gold; Alexandra Papaioannou; J Brent Richards; Jonathan D Adachi; Kenneth W Lyles
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  A survey of haplotype variants at several disease candidate genes: the importance of rare variants for complex diseases.

Authors:  P-Y Liu; Y-Y Zhang; Y Lu; J-R Long; H Shen; Lan-J Zhao; F-H Xu; P Xiao; D-H Xiong; Y-J Liu; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Birth weight and musculoskeletal health in 36-year-old men and women: results from the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Saskia J te Velde; Jos W R Twisk; Willem van Mechelen; Han C G Kemper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.