Literature DB >> 16944089

Examination of short binary sequences for mfERG recording.

Richard P Hagan1, Anthony C Fisher, Malcolm C Brown.   

Abstract

The mfERG, when first introduced by Erich Sutter used long sequences with short periods (approximately 15 ms) between steps (flashes). Since then a number of studies have introduced slower or modified sequences to emphasise Oscillatory Potentials (OPs), Optic Nerve Head Components (ONHC) or the s-wave. With this reduction in the rate of presentation many of the investigators have reduced the length of the sequence to allow a shorter recording period. This is also desirable for patient comfort and co-operation in diagnostic investigations. When reducing the length of the sequence there is a risk that it will be too short to ensure orthogonality of the first order component and all significant higher order components, particularly when a large number of areas (hexagons) are stimulated. This paper aims to verify that a short sequence (using the sequence used by the Roland Retiscan stimulating 19 hexagons) is capable of keeping responses of both first and higher orders separate for each stimulating area. The sequence was investigated by placing photodiodes connected to a Diagnosys Espion and then exported to Excel and MATLAB for analysis. It was determined that the sequences used were m-sequences length n = 9. The photodiode only responded to flashes of light so was unable to detect a correcting 0 at the end of sequence. The sequences driving each hexagon were then determined and found to be shifted 26 steps from each other. The correlation coefficients between all sequences was found to be -1/(2n -1). The sequences to decode the second order kernels were determined and the correlation coefficients between each of these sequences, and between these and the original sequences, were also -1/(2n -1). This work provides a mathematical validation of the use of short sequences for slow mfERG, and describes an empirical test method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16944089     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-006-9009-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  21 in total

1.  The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels.

Authors:  E Sutter
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The optic nerve head component of the human ERG.

Authors:  E E Sutter; M A Bearse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effects of APB, PDA, and TTX on ERG responses recorded using both multifocal and conventional methods in monkey. Effects of APB, PDA, and TTX on monkey ERG responses.

Authors:  William A Hare; Hau Ton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Andrew Charles James
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Regional variations in local contributions to the primate photopic flash ERG: revealed using the slow-sequence mfERG.

Authors:  Nalini V Rangaswamy; Donald C Hood; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Multifocal electroretinography in patients with Stargardt's macular dystrophy.

Authors:  U Kretschmann; M W Seeliger; K Ruether; T Usui; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; E Zrenner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  A topographic study of oscillatory potentials in man.

Authors:  S Wu; E E Sutter
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  A new wavelet in the multifocal electroretinogram, probably originating from ganglion cells.

Authors:  Marie Sano; Yutaka Tazawa; Takashi Nabeshima; Mariko Mita
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique.

Authors:  D C Hood; K Holopigian; V Greenstein; W Seiple; J Li; E E Sutter; R E Carr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Multifocal electroretinogram in occult macular dystrophy.

Authors:  C H Piao; M Kondo; A Tanikawa; H Terasaki; Y Miyake
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  6 in total

1.  Investigation of the temporal properties of the retina using the m-sequence.

Authors:  Richard P Hagan; Anthony C Fisher; Malcolm C Brown
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Deficits in the electroretinogram in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and changes during photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Alison M Mackay; Malcolm C Brown; Richard P Hagan; Anthony C Fisher; Ian Grierson; Simon P Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Safety and acceptability of an organic light-emitting diode sleep mask as a potential therapy for retinal disease.

Authors:  J N Sahni; G Czanner; T Gutu; S A Taylor; K M Bennett; S M Wuerger; I Grierson; C Murray-Dunning; M N Holland; S P Harding
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Multifocal electroretinogram contributes to differentiation of various clinical pictures within a family with Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

Authors:  A Praidou; R Hagan; H Nayak; A Chandna
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Multifocal electroretinography as a predictor of maintenance of vision after photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Alison M Mackay; Malcolm C Brown; Ian Grierson; Simon P Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Early diagnosis of Stargardt disease with multifocal electroretinogram in children.

Authors:  Anna Praidou; Richard Hagan; William Newman; Arvind Chandna
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.