Literature DB >> 11291949

Impact of notch filter use on waveforms of First- and Second-Order-Kernel responses from multifocal ERGs.

M Bock1, C Gerth, B Lorenz.   

Abstract

The filter settings of the amplifier section of ERG recording systems have large impact on the waveforms of the recorded responses. In this study, the effects of a 50 Hz notch filter were assessed for both First-Order-Kernel- (FOK) and Second-Order-Kernel-responses (SOK 1st slice) from multifocal ERGs recorded with a VERIS III system. Amplitude and phase responses of the amplifier section were recorded for typical filter settings with the notch filter active and inactive. Multifocal ERGs (MERGs) from a group of 11 normal subjects were recorded for both amplifier settings, the waveforms resulted from those recordings were compared in the time and frequency domain. To verify the results, the recordings without the notch filter were digitally filtered with a simulated notch filter and compared to the responses recorded with an active analog notch filter. The line filter has the biggest attenuation at 50 Hz with an additional phase jump of 180 degrees. The FOK responses of MERGs are assembled by frequencies below 65 Hz with main spectral components between 19 and 47 Hz. The 1st slice of the SOK consists of frequencies up to 100 Hz with main components between 19 and 84 Hz. Thus, if FOK recordings are to be analyzed, the notch filter of the amplifier can be used in order to cope with noise problems caused by the line frequency of 50 Hz. However, one must be aware that the attenuation of higher frequency components will lead to changes of the waveforms. For SOK analysis, main spectral components are attenuated and/or shifted in phase, which leads to completely different waveforms and severe distortion of the recording results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11291949     DOI: 10.1023/a:1002720819696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  12 in total

1.  The optic nerve head component of the human ERG.

Authors:  E E Sutter; M A Bearse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Guidelines for calibration of stimulus and recording parameters used in clinical electrophysiology of vision. Calibration Standard Committee of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV).

Authors:  M Brigell; M Bach; C Barber; K Kawasaki; A Kooijman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The field topography of ERG components in man--I. The photopic luminance response.

Authors:  E E Sutter; D Tran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Multifocal electroretinography in patients with Stargardt's macular dystrophy.

Authors:  U Kretschmann; M W Seeliger; K Ruether; T Usui; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; E Zrenner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms.

Authors:  M W Seeliger; U H Kretschmann; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; E Zrenner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs.

Authors:  D C Hood; W Seiple; K Holopigian; V Greenstein
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Functional imaging of the retina using the multifocal electroretinograph: a control study.

Authors:  S Parks; D Keating; T H Williamson; A L Evans; A T Elliott; J L Jay
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique.

Authors:  D C Hood; K Holopigian; V Greenstein; W Seiple; J Li; E E Sutter; R E Carr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  Towards optimal filtering of "standard" multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) recordings: findings in normal and diabetic subjects.

Authors:  Y Han; M A Bearse; M E Schneck; S Barez; C Jacobsen; A J Adams
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.