Literature DB >> 9588466

Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of long-term outcome 12 years after operative and conservative treatment.

H Hurri1, P Slätis, J Soini, K Tallroth, H Alaranta, T Laine, M Heliövaara.   

Abstract

The present study focuses on the long-term prognosis of radiographically verified stenosis of the lower lumbar spine. The purpose here was to describe the outcome 12 years after radiographic diagnosis of spinal stenosis and to identify factors predicting disability after operative or conservative treatment. Data were compiled on 75 patients (43 men and 32 women) with changes in functional myelography diagnostic for spinal stenosis. Their mean age at the interview 12 years later was 61 years. The sagittal diameter of the dural sac was measured from baseline myelographs at all intervertebral levels and was corrected for magnification. In the interview, subjective outcome assessment was obtained with a structured questionnaire, and the low-back disorder was scored using the Oswestry disability index. The sagittal diameter of the dural sac was severely stenotic (<7.0 mm) in 32 patients (26 operated), and moderately stenotic (7.0-10.5 mm) in 43 patients (31 operated). The severity of the stenosis significantly predicted disability, even when the effects of age, sex, therapy regimen, and body mass index were adjusted for. For moderate and severe stenosis, the adjusted mean Oswestry indices were 28.4 and 39.1, respectively (p = 0.01). Therapy as such (operative versus nonoperative) did not significantly correlate with later disability. The radiographic severity of lumbar spinal stenosis predicts disability independently of therapy regimen. Randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the indications for surgical and conservative treatment. Radiographic severity of the stenosis should be considered as an effect-modifying or confounding factor in clinical trials and other studies focusing on the outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9588466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  20 in total

1.  Stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability.

Authors:  Johannes Holinka; Petra Krepler; Michael Matzner; Josef G Grohs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  B Micankova Adamova; S Vohanka; L Dusek; J Jarkovsky; J Bednarik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Kosmas S Stafilas; Anastasios V Korompilias; Konstantinos C Zacharis; Alexandros E Beris; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Predominant leg pain is associated with better surgical outcomes in degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: results from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Adam Pearson; Emily Blood; Jon Lurie; William Abdu; Dilip Sengupta; John W Frymoyer; James Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

6.  Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT.

Authors:  Adam Pearson; Jon Lurie; Tor Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; William Abdu; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.

Authors:  J F Zucherman; K Y Hsu; C A Hartjen; T F Mehalic; D A Implicito; M J Martin; D R Johnson; G A Skidmore; P P Vessa; J W Dwyer; S Puccio; J C Cauthen; R M Ozuna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Somatic comorbidity and younger age are associated with life dissatisfaction among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment.

Authors:  Sanna Sinikallio; Timo Aalto; Olavi Airaksinen; Arto Herno; Heikki Kröger; Sakari Savolainen; Veli Turunen; Heimo Viinamäki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Outcomes and their predictors in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 12-year follow-up.

Authors:  B Adamova; S Vohanka; L Dusek; J Jarkovsky; R Chaloupka; J Bednarik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Variation in outcomes across centers after surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  Atman Desai; Kimon Bekelis; Perry A Ball; Jon Lurie; Sohail K Mirza; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.