Literature DB >> 20419452

Stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability.

Johannes Holinka1, Petra Krepler, Michael Matzner, Josef G Grohs.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers (IS) in combination with interlaminar decompression in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability with lumbar spinal stenosis and to compare its clinical effect to patients with lumbar spinal stenosis in stable segments treated by interlaminar decompression only. Fifty consecutive patients with a minimum age of 60 years were scheduled for interlaminar decompression for clinically and radiologically confirmed lumbar spinal stenosis. Twenty-two of these patients (group DS) with concomitant degenerative low-grade lumbar instability up to 5 mm translational slip were treated by interlaminar decompression and additional dynamic IS implantation. The control group (D) with lumbar spinal stenosis in stable segments included 28 patients and underwent only interlaminar decompression. The mean follow-up was 46 months in group D and 44 months in group DS. A visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and walking distance were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. The segmental instability was evaluated in flexion-extension X-rays. The implantation of an IS significantly reduced the lumbar instability on flexion-extension X-rays. At the time of follow-up walking distance, VAS and ODI showed a significant improvement in both groups, but no statistical significance between groups D and DS. Four patients each in groups D and DS had revision surgery during the period of evaluation. The stabilising effect of dynamic IS in combination with interlaminar decompression offers an opportunity for an effective treatment for degenerative low-grade lumbar instability with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20419452      PMCID: PMC3047654          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1017-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Spondylolisthesis, its cause and effect.

Authors:  P H NEWMAN
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1955-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; J Drumm; K Häussler; C Mack; W-I Steudel; A Kettler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome?

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Klaus Schlüter-Brust; Thomas Kaulhausen; Marc Röllinghoff; Britta Joswig; Hartmut Stützer; Peer Eysel; Patrick Simons; Johannes Kuchta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.

Authors:  James F Zucherman; Ken Y Hsu; Charles A Hartjen; Thomas F Mehalic; Dante A Implicito; Michael J Martin; Donald R Johnson; Grant A Skidmore; Paul P Vessa; James W Dwyer; Stephen T Puccio; Joseph C Cauthen; Richard M Ozuna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Johannes Kuchta; Rolf Sobottke; Peer Eysel; Patrick Simons
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Principles of designing a cohort study in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Dianne M Bryant; Kevin Willits; Beate P Hanson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  K Anthony Kim; Matthew McDonald; Justin H T Pik; Paul Khoueir; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Failure of the Wallis interspinous implant to lower the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniations in patients undergoing primary disc excision.

Authors:  Yizhar Floman; Michael A Millgram; Yossi Smorgick; Nahshon Rand; Ely Ashkenazi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2007-07

9.  High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Olaf J Verhoof; Johannes L Bron; Frits H Wapstra; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability.

Authors:  Doo-Sik Kong; Eun-Sang Kim; Whan Eoh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Interspinous process devices for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mao Li; Huilin Yang; Genlin Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Identification of the same species in at least two intra-operative samples for prosthetic joint infection diagnostics yields the best results with broad-range polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Mitja Rak; Darja Barlič-Maganja; Martina Kavčič; Rihard Trebše; Andrej Cőr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Preliminary efficacy of inter-spinal distraction fusion which is a new technique for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Hongyu Wei; Hai Tang; Tidong Zhang; Hao Chen; Chunke Dong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue.

Authors:  Mitja Rak; Martina KavčIč; Rihard Trebše; Andrej CőR
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.