Literature DB >> 16538522

Somatic comorbidity and younger age are associated with life dissatisfaction among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment.

Sanna Sinikallio1, Timo Aalto, Olavi Airaksinen, Arto Herno, Heikki Kröger, Sakari Savolainen, Veli Turunen, Heimo Viinamäki.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to examine self-reported life satisfaction and associated factors in patients (n=100) with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in secondary care level, selected for surgical treatment. Life satisfaction was assessed with the four-item Life Satisfaction scale. Depression was assessed with a 21-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Psychological well-being was assessed with Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Sense of Coherence Scale. LSS related physical functioning and pain were assessed with Oswestry disability index, Stucki questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale and pain drawings. All questionnaires were administered before surgical treatment of LSS. Results showed that 25% of the patients with LSS were found to be dissatisfied with life. In a univariate analysis, smoking, elevated subjective disability scores and extensive markings in the pain drawings were more common in the dissatisfied patients. The dissatisfied patients also showed lower coping resources, elevated alexithymia and depression scores, and were more often depressed. In multiple logistic regression analyses, only younger age and somatic comorbidity were associated with life dissatisfaction. This association remained significant even when the BDI score was added into the model. No other significant associations emerged. In conclusion, life dissatisfaction was rather common among preoperative LSS patients. Pain and constraints on everyday functioning were important correlates of life dissatisfaction. However, only younger age and somatic comorbidity were independently associated with life dissatisfaction. These results emphasize the importance of recognizing and assessing the effect of coexisting medical conditions and they need to be addressed in any treatment program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16538522      PMCID: PMC2219643          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0080-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  48 in total

1.  What influences self-perception of health in the elderly? The role of objective health condition, subjective well-being and sense of coherence.

Authors:  Gudrun Schneider; Georg Driesch; Andreas Kruse; Michael Wachter; Hans-Georg Nehen; Gereon Heuft
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Life satisfaction, happiness, and morale: two problems with the use of subjective well-being indicators.

Authors:  J Horley
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1984-04

3.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

4.  Life satisfaction in patients with chest pain subsequently diagnosed as coronary heart disease--connection through depressive symptoms?

Authors:  M Valkamo; H T Koivumaa-Honkanen; J Hintikka; L Niskanen; K Honkalampi; H Viinamäki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly.

Authors:  J M Mossey; E Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Sense of coherence--stability over time and relation to health, disease, and psychosocial changes in a general population: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Berit Nilsson; Lars Holmgren; Birgitta Stegmayr; Göran Westman
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  A rating system for use with patient pain drawings.

Authors:  Ronald B Margolis; Raymond C Tait; Steven J Krause
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain.

Authors:  Donald D Price; Patricia A McGrath; Amir Rafii; Barbara Buckingham
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Severity of disease and quality of life: a comparison in patients with cancer and benign disease.

Authors:  J O Hörnquist; B Hansson; I Akerlind; J Larsson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Is the Beck Depression Inventory suitable for screening major depression in different phases of the disease?

Authors:  Heimo Viinamäki; Antti Tanskanen; Kirsi Honkalampi; Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen; Kaisa Haatainen; Olli Kaustio; Jukka Hintikka
Journal:  Nord J Psychiatry       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.202

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; M Schneider; B Marquardt; U Liljenqvist; T A Pietilä; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Predictors of improvement in quality of life and pain relief in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age: a study based on the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Christian Herren; Jan Siewe; Anne F Mannion; Christoph Röder; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up.

Authors:  Timo J Aalto; Ville Leinonen; Arto Herno; Markku Alen; Heikki Kröger; Veli Turunen; Sakari Savolainen; Tapani Saari; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Harald Prüss; Randolf Klingebiel; Vieri Failli; Karl M Einhäupl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Depression is associated with poorer outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.

Authors:  Sanna Sinikallio; Timo Aalto; Olavi Airaksinen; Arto Herno; Heikki Kröger; Sakari Savolainen; Veli Turunen; Heimo Viinamäki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Life dissatisfaction is associated with a poorer surgery outcome and depression among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  Sanna Sinikallio; Timo Aalto; Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen; Olavi Airaksinen; Arto Herno; Heikki Kröger; Heimo Viinamäki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.