Literature DB >> 9587864

Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve.

P Pibarot1, J G Dumesnil, M Lemieux, P Cartier, J Métras, L G Durand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: Previous studies have shown that the effective orifice area of an aortic prosthetic valve may be too small in relation to the patient's body surface area, resulting in abnormally high gradients. The consequences of this condition, termed prosthesis-patient mismatch, have not been fully studied. The study objective was to determine if the condition has a detrimental effect on symptomatic and hemodynamic status, morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
METHODS: A cohort of 392 patients was prospectively followed for up to seven years after implantation of a Medtronic Intact bioprosthesis. Doppler echocardiography was performed annually in 72 patients. Based on previous studies, presence of mismatch was defined as an indexed valve area < or = 0.85 cm2/m2.
RESULTS: Mismatch was associated with less postoperative improvement of NYHA functional class (p < 0.009) independently of other predictors, such as age and preoperative functional class, but had no significant impact on patient survival (mismatch: 75 +/- 4%, no mismatch: 79 +/- 3%; p = 0.59) and valve-related morbidity up to seven years. Cardiac index was similar in patients with and without mismatch up to three years after operation but decreased significantly thereafter only in patients with mismatch (-0.54 +/- 0.32 versus -0.17 +/- 0.49 l/min/m2; p = 0.04). Likewise, the mean transprosthetic gradient, which was higher at one year after operation in patients with mismatch (22 +/- 8 versus 15 +/- 7 mmHg), increased significantly (+6 +/- 6 versus +1 +/- 1 mmHg; p = 0.008) only in this group during follow up.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mismatch have less symptomatic improvement and worse hemodynamics that continue to deteriorate with time. However, medium-term prognosis (up to seven years) is relatively good. Further studies are necessary to determine the longer-term effects of mismatch on morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9587864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  19 in total

Review 1.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.

Authors:  P Pibarot; J G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Aortic valve replacement with sutureless prosthesis: better than root enlargement to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch?

Authors:  Erik Beckmann; Andreas Martens; Firas Alhadi; Klaus Hoeffler; Julia Umminger; Tim Kaufeld; Samir Sarikouch; Nurbol Koigeldiev; Serghei Cebotari; Jan Dieter Schmitto; Axel Haverich; Malakh Shrestha
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-02-25

3.  Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method?

Authors:  Sabine Bleiziffer; Walter B Eichinger; Ina Hettich; Ralf Guenzinger; Daniel Ruzicka; Robert Bauernschmitt; Ruediger Lange
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Update on aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Kazuhiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-13

Review 5.  Beginning and development of surgery for acquired valvular heart disease in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-11-12

6.  Incidence and impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hatim Seoudy; Nathalie Güßefeld; Johanne Frank; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Georg Lutter; Matthias Eden; Ashraf Yusuf Rangrez; Christian Kuhn; Norbert Frey; Derk Frank
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Is the threshold for postoperative prosthesis-patient mismatch the same for all prostheses?

Authors:  Homare Okamura; Atsushi Yamaguchi; Hideki Morita; Kazuhiro Naito; Koichi Yuri; Hideo Adachi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch increases the mean platelet volume in patients with aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Huseyin Bayram; Mete Hidiroglu; Levent Cetin; Omer Faruk Cicek; Aslihan Kucuker; Emrah Uguz; Kemal Esref Erdogan; Erol Sener
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch after aortic valve replacement in the elderly.

Authors:  Masaaki Ryomoto; Masataka Mitsuno; Mitsuhiro Yamamura; Hiroe Tanaka; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Shinya Fukui; Noriko Tsujiya; Tetsuya Kajiyama; Yuji Miyamoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-07-08

Review 10.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Abdellaziz Dahou; Haïfa Mahjoub; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.