Literature DB >> 18607679

Patient-prosthesis mismatch after aortic valve replacement in the elderly.

Masaaki Ryomoto1, Masataka Mitsuno, Mitsuhiro Yamamura, Hiroe Tanaka, Yasuhiko Kobayashi, Shinya Fukui, Noriko Tsujiya, Tetsuya Kajiyama, Yuji Miyamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) on survival and left ventricular mass regression in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on patients >65 years old who underwent isolated AVR from 1990 and 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. A bioprosthesis was used in 42 cases and a mechanical valve in 59. The mean follow-up period was 3.1 years (0.1-14.2 years). The indexed effective orifice area (i-EOA) was determined from echocardiographic data in clinical reports in the literature and indexed to body surface area (cm2/m2). Mild PPM was defined as an i-EOA between 0.65 and 0.85. We also evaluated the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and the left ventricular mass (LVM) index.
RESULTS: A total of 34 patients (33.6%) had PPM. No patient had an i-EOA <0.65. Freedom from valve-related death was 86.3% +/- 6.7% in the PPM-negative group and 85.7% +/- 7.9% in the PPM-positive group at 5 years after AVR. The mean LVM index (g/m2) decreased significantly (P < 0.01), from 239.2 to 167.4 in the PPM-negative group and from 229.1 to 154.4 in the PPM-positive group, respectively. NYHA functional status was excellent at late follow-up in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Mild PPM occurred in a large proportion of elderly patients undergoing AVR but did not affect midterm survival or LV mass regression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18607679     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-008-0255-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  17 in total

Review 1.  Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention.

Authors:  P Pibarot; J G Dumesnil
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly.

Authors:  Antonino Roscitano; Umberto Benedetto; Alfonso Sciangula; Eusebio Merico; Filippo Barberi; Roberto Bianchini; Euclide Tonelli; Riccardo Sinatra
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 3.  Relation of age to left ventricular function in clinically normal adults.

Authors:  D J Slotwiner; R B Devereux; J E Schwartz; T G Pickering; G de Simone; A Ganau; P S Saba; M J Roman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Thomas Walther; Ardawan Rastan; Volkmar Falk; Sven Lehmann; Jens Garbade; Anne K Funkat; Friedrich W Mohr; Jan F Gummert
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Colleen Gorman Koch; Farah Khandwala; Fawzy G Estafanous; Floyd D Loop; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable?

Authors:  Rafael García Fuster; José A Montero Argudo; Oscar Gil Albarova; Fernando Hornero Sos; Sergio Cánovas López; María Bueno Codoñer; José A Buendía Miñano; Ignacio Rodríguez Albarran
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-12-25       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Nineteen-millimeter prosthetic aortic valves allow normalization of left ventricular mass in elderly women.

Authors:  Darren H Freed; James W Tam; Michael C Moon; Gregory E J Harding; Ejaz Ahmad; Edward A Pascoe
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant.

Authors:  Naoji Hanayama; George T Christakis; Hari R Mallidi; Campbell D Joyner; Stephen E Fremes; Christopher D Morgan; Peter R R Mitoff; Bernard S Goldman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Mechanical valve prosthesis is a valid option for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.

Authors:  Marisa De Feo; Francesco Onorati; Attilio Renzulli; Rosario Gregorio; Mariano Vicchio; Nicola Vitale; Maurizio Cotrufo
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2004-01
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Update on aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Kazuhiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-13

2.  Patient Prosthesis Mismatch After SAVR and TAVR.

Authors:  Sabine Bleiziffer; Tanja K Rudolph
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.