Literature DB >> 27366574

Do Urgent Caesarean Sections Have a Circadian Rhythm?

Serkan Doğru1, Hatice Yılmaz Doğru2, Tuğba Karaman1, Aynur Şahin1, Hakan Tapar1, Serkan Karaman1, Semih Arıcı1, Asker Zeki Özsoy2, Bülent Çakmak2, Çiğdem Kunt İşgüder2, İlhan Bahri Delibaş2, Alkan Karakış1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of the present study was to demonstrate the existence of a possible circadian variation in urgent operative deliveries.
METHODS: All urgent caesarean sections between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2015 with known exact onset times of operation were included in this retrospective study. Cases that were previously scheduled for elective caesarean section were excluded. Information regarding age, delivery date, onset time of operation and type of anaesthesia was collected from the database. Analyses were completed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) version 20.0 software. The statistical significance for all analyses was set at p<0.05.
RESULTS: A total of 285 urgent caesarean section deliveries were included in the study. There were 126 (44.2%) deliveries during the day shift and 159 (55.8%) during the night shift. 80 patients (28.1%) received general anaesthesia and 65 (22.8%) received spinal anaesthesia in the morning shift, whereas 54 patients (18.9%) received general anaesthesia and 86 (30.2%) received spinal anaesthesia during the night shift.
CONCLUSION: The present study suggested that urgent caesarean sections revealed a circadian rhythm during the day.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; anaesthesia; general; spinal

Year:  2016        PMID: 27366574      PMCID: PMC4925001          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2016.57614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  16 in total

1.  The seasonality of live birth is strongly influenced by socio-demographic factors.

Authors:  M Bobak; A Gjonca
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Differences between obstetricians in caesarean section rates and the management of labour.

Authors:  J Guillemette; W D Fraser
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1992-02

3.  Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates.

Authors:  Ana P Betrán; Mario Merialdi; Jeremy A Lauer; Wang Bing-Shun; Jane Thomas; Paul Van Look; Marsden Wagner
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  A circadian variation in the observed duration of labor. Possible causes and implications.

Authors:  B Backe
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua D Dahlke; Hector Mendez-Figueroa; Dwight J Rouse; Vincenzo Berghella; Jason K Baxter; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-99.

Authors:  F Menacker; S C Curtin
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2001-12-27

7.  Term labor induction compared with expectant management.

Authors:  J Christopher Glantz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Differences among obstetricians in caesarean section rates.

Authors:  S M Menticoglou
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 9.  Techniques for cesarean section.

Authors:  Justus G Hofmeyr; Natalia Novikova; Matthews Mathai; Archana Shah
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.

Authors:  Sarah J Stock; Evelyn Ferguson; Andrew Duffy; Ian Ford; James Chalmers; Jane E Norman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.