Literature DB >> 9559375

An analogue laser optical disc in comparison with cinefilm for visual analysis of coronary narrowings before and after coronary angioplasty.

S A Chamuleau1, J J Piek, W B Hanekamp, Y E Appelman, K T Koch, R J Peters, W E Kok, G Bloemhard, G A la Rivière, G K David.   

Abstract

This study evaluated an analogue laser optical disc (MVP) as an alternative for cinefilm angiography in the visual analysis of coronary angiograms. Visual analysis was performed independently by 5 observers using cinefilm and MVP before and after PTCA (194 coronary lesions in 88 patients) and the outcomes were compared with QCA. The mean percentage diameter stenosis on cinefilm and MVP yielded similar results compared to QCA. Regression analysis showed a good correlation between the mean cinefilm and MVP values per diameter stenosis (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots confirmed these findings. Qualitative analysis for detection of coronary dissections after PTCA showed an incidence of 31.3% (cinefilm) and 21.8% (MVP) (p < 0.05). The results of this study indicate that the visual analysis of the coronary angiograms using the analogue laser optical disc (MVP) yields similar results compared to the cinefilm concerning coronary lesion severity, although there is an underestimation of coronary dissections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9559375     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005961316757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  28 in total

1.  Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography.

Authors:  R M Fleming; R L Kirkeeide; R W Smalling; K L Gould
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  The DICOM standard. A breakthrough for digital information exchange in cardiology.

Authors:  C Parisot
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1995

3.  Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method.

Authors:  G B Mancini; S B Simon; M J McGillem; M T LeFree; H Z Friedman; R A Vogel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Digital geometric measurements in comparison to cinefilm analysis of coronary artery dimensions.

Authors:  J Haase; S K Nugteren; E Montauban van Swijndregt; C J Slager; C Di Mario; P J de Feyter; P W Serruys
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1993-04

6.  Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.

Authors:  T A DeRouen; J A Murray; W Owen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Influence of operator- and patient-dependent variables on the suitability of automated quantitative coronary arteriography for routine clinical use.

Authors:  J C Gurley; S E Nissen; D C Booth; A N DeMaria
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiographic analysis: review of methods, utility, and limitations.

Authors:  J B Hermiller; J T Cusma; L A Spero; D F Fortin; M B Harding; T M Bashore
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1992-02

10.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?

Authors:  C W White; C B Wright; D B Doty; L F Hiratza; C L Eastham; D G Harrison; M L Marcus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-03-29       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Adequate patient selection for coronary revascularization: an overview of current methods used in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Steven A J Chamuleau; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Martijn Meuwissen; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.