Literature DB >> 20329841

The effect of tectorial membrane and basilar membrane longitudinal coupling in cochlear mechanics.

Julien Meaud1, Karl Grosh.   

Abstract

Most mathematical models of the mammalian cochlea neglect structural longitudinal coupling. However, recent experimental data suggest that viscoelastic longitudinal coupling, in the basilar membrane (BM) and the tectorial membrane (TM), is non-negligible. In this paper, mathematical models for BM and TM longitudinal coupling are presented to determine the influence of such a coupling on the tuning of the BM. The longitudinal coupling models are added to a macroscopic linear model of the guinea pig cochlea that includes the micromechanics of the organ of Corti and outer hair cell (OHC) somatic motility. The predictions of the BM response to acoustic stimulus show that the characteristic frequency is controlled by a TM radial resonance and that TM longitudinal coupling has a more significant effect than BM longitudinal coupling. TM viscoelasticity controls the sharpness of the BM frequency response and the duration of the impulse response. The results with realistic TM longitudinal coupling are more consistent with experiments. The model predicts that OHC somatic electromotility is able to supply power to the BM at frequencies well above the cutoff of the OHC basolateral membrane. Moreover, TM longitudinal coupling is predicted to stabilize the cochlea and enable a higher BM sensitivity to acoustic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20329841      PMCID: PMC2856508          DOI: 10.1121/1.3290995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Limiting dynamics of high-frequency electromechanical transduction of outer hair cells.

Authors:  G Frank; W Hemmert; A W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measurement of the mechanical properties of isolated tectorial membrane using atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Rachel Gueta; David Barlam; Roni Z Shneck; Itay Rousso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A mechano-electro-acoustical model for the cochlea: response to acoustic stimuli.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Niranjan V Deo; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Tectorial membrane stiffness gradients.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Gulam Emadi; Geoffrey Getnick; Alicia Quesnel; Peter Dallos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Basilar membrane tension calculations for the gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Ram C Naidu; David C Mountain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Silencing the cochlear amplifier by immobilizing prestin.

Authors:  Ulrich Müller; Peter Gillespie
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Orthotropic material properties of the gerbil basilar membrane.

Authors:  Shuangqin Liu; Robert D White
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Frequency-dependent shear impedance of the tectorial membrane.

Authors:  Jianwen Wendy Gu; Werner Hemmert; Dennis M Freeman; A J Aranyosi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membrane.

Authors:  Roozbeh Ghaffari; Alexander J Aranyosi; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Chlorpromazine alters cochlear mechanics and amplification: in vivo evidence for a role of stiffness modulation in the organ of corti.

Authors:  Jiefu Zheng; Niranjan Deo; Yuan Zou; Karl Grosh; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  51 in total

1.  Response to a pure tone in a nonlinear mechanical-electrical-acoustical model of the cochlea.

Authors:  Julien Meaud; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Direction of wave propagation in the cochlea for internally excited basilar membrane.

Authors:  Yizeng Li; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear partition anatomy and motion in humans differ from the classic view of mammals.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; John J Guinan; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Coupling active hair bundle mechanics, fast adaptation, and somatic motility in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Julien Meaud; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Basilar membrane velocity in a cochlea with a modified organ of Corti.

Authors:  N Eze; E S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Dual traveling waves in an inner ear model with two degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Jessica S Lamb; Richard S Chadwick
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

8.  Two-compartment passive frequency domain cochlea model allowing independent fluid coupling to the tectorial and basilar membranes.

Authors:  John Cormack; Yanju Liu; Jong-Hoon Nam; Sheryl M Gracewski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  An analytic physically motivated model of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Samiya A Alkhairy; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Tectorial membrane travelling waves underlie abnormal hearing in Tectb mutant mice.

Authors:  Roozbeh Ghaffari; Alexander J Aranyosi; Guy P Richardson; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.