Literature DB >> 9511131

Colorectal cancer in women: an underappreciated but preventable risk.

J M Donovan1, S Syngal.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most common non-skin malignancy in women, after breast and lung cancer. Although approximately 40% of the 65,000 women diagnosed each year eventually die of the disease, colon cancer is highly curable when diagnosed at an early stage. Moreover, because the majority of colon cancers arise in previously benign colonic polyps, there is a substantial period, up to several years, in which removal of polyps can reduce the risk of colon cancer. Recently, the United States Preventive Task Force recommended universal screening for colon cancer after age 50. Strong evidence from randomized controlled trials and case-control studies supports use of annual testing for occult blood in stool and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5-7 years. Although the risk of colon cancer is similar in men and women, women frequently have the perception that colorectal cancer is a man's disease. Partially in consequence, women are less likely than men to undergo screening sigmoidoscopy. Further barriers include primary care providers' lack of awareness of updated guidelines and patients' lack of compliance with multiple screening tests and their fear of discomfort. Because the risk of colorectal cancer can be reduced by up to 75% in those who undergo screening and subsequent surveillance to remove further polyps, it is crucial that women be targeted to undergo screening tests for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9511131     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health        ISSN: 1059-7115            Impact factor:   2.681


  9 in total

1.  Non-compliance in surveillance for patients with previous resection of large (> or = 1 cm) colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Wolfgang-M Brueckl; Berit Fritsche; Brigitte Seifert; Frank Boxberger; Heinz Albrecht; Roland-S Croner; Axel Wein; Eckhart-G Hahn
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Colonoscopic screening and follow-up for colorectal cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Jun Wan; Zi-Qi Zhang; Cheng Zhu; Meng-Wei Wang; Dong-Hai Zhao; Yong-He Fu; Jian-Ping Zhang; Ya-Hong Wang; Ben-Yan Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Physician and patient factors associated with ordering a colon evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Barbara Turner; Ronald E Myers; Terry Hyslop; Walter W Hauck; David Weinberg; Timothy Brigham; James Grana; Todd Rothermel; Neil Schlackman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Impact of Patient Gender and Race and Physician Communication on Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Visits in Primary Care.

Authors:  Heather L Rogers; Levent Dumenci; Ronald M Epstein; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in mammography-adherent older women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Jennifer S Ford; David Klein; Louis H Primavera; Tamara R Buckley; Traci R Stein; Moshe Shike; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-12

6.  Development of community plans to enhance survivorship from colorectal cancer: community-based participatory research in rural communities.

Authors:  Eugene J Lengerich; Brenda C Kluhsman; Marcyann Bencivenga; Regina Allen; Mary Beth Miele; Elana Farace
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Colorectal cancer knowledge is not associated with screening compliance or intention.

Authors:  David S Weinberg; Suzanne Miller; Michelle Rodoletz; Brian Egleston; Linda Fleisher; Joanne Buzaglo; Eileen Keenan; Jaime Marks; Eric Bieber
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Breast and colorectal cancer screening and sources of cancer information among older women in the United States: results from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Zahava Berkowitz; Nikki A Hawkins; Florence Tangka
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Gender Differences in Surgery for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injury: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Andrea M Jones; Mieke Koehoorn; Christopher B Mcleod
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.