Literature DB >> 17143947

Non-compliance in surveillance for patients with previous resection of large (> or = 1 cm) colorectal adenomas.

Wolfgang-M Brueckl1, Berit Fritsche, Brigitte Seifert, Frank Boxberger, Heinz Albrecht, Roland-S Croner, Axel Wein, Eckhart-G Hahn.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the extent and reasons of non-compliance in surveillance for patients undergoing polypectomy of large (> or = 1 cm) colorectal adenomas.
METHODS: Between 1995 and 2002, colorectal adenomas > or = 1 cm were diagnosed in 210 patients and subsequently documented at the Erlangen Registry of Colorectal Polyps. One hundred and fifty-eight patients (75.2%) could be contacted by telephone and agreed to be interviewed. Additionally, records were obtained from the treating physicians.
RESULTS: Fifty-four out of 158 patients (34.2%) neglected any surveillance. Reasons for non-compliance included lack of knowledge concerning surveillance intervals (45.8%), no symptoms (29.2%), fear of examination (18.8%) or old age/severe illness (6.3%). In a multivariate analysis, the factors including female gender (P = 0.036) and age > 62 years (P = 0.016) proved to be significantly associated with non-compliance in surveillance.
CONCLUSION: Efforts to increase compliance in surveillance are of utmost importance. This applies particularly to women's compliance. Effective strategies for avoiding metachronous colorectal adenoma and cancer should focus on both the improvement in awareness and knowledge of patients and information about physicians for surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17143947      PMCID: PMC4087489          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i45.7313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  27 in total

1.  Prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer: pay now or pay later.

Authors:  J D Lewis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Colorectal cancer screening participation by older women.

Authors:  M T Mandelson; S J Curry; L A Anderson; M R Nadel; N C Lee; C M Rutter; A Z LaCroix
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Right-sided shift found in metachronous colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  G Nusko; U Mansmann; G Wiest; W Brueckl; T Kirchner; E G Hahn
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake.

Authors:  A M Codori; G M Petersen; D L Miglioretti; E K Larkin; M T Bushey; C Young; J D Brensinger; K Johnson; J A Bacon; S V Booker
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  The evolution of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  B C Morson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas.

Authors:  M E Martínez; R Sampliner; J R Marshall; A K Bhattacharyya; M E Reid; D S Alberts
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Recurrence and malignancy rates in a benign colorectal neoplasm patient cohort: results of a 5-year analysis in a managed care environment.

Authors:  S K Gandhi; M W Reynolds; J G Boyer; J L Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J Hsia; E Kemper; C Kiefe; J Zapka; S Sofaer; M Pettinger; D Bowen; M Limacher; L Lillington; E Mason
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; F Delcò; J M Inadomi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening.

Authors:  J Wardle; S Sutton; S Williamson; T Taylor; K McCaffery; J Cuzick; A Hart; W Atkin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  9 in total

1.  Recurrence with malignancy after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps with high-grade dysplasia: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Neal Mehta; Ashraf Abushahin; Meena Sadaps; Mohammad Alomari; John Vargo; Deepa Patil; Rocio Lopez; Matthew Kalady; Conor P Delaney; Emre Gorgun; James Church; Yutaka Saito; Carol A Burke; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Adherence to Post-polypectomy Guidelines: Just One Piece of an Important Puzzle.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Emma C Robbins; Kevin Pack; Iain Stenson; Paula L Kirby; Bhavita Patel; Matthew D Rutter; Andrew M Veitch; Brian P Saunders; Matthew Little; Alastair Gray; Stephen W Duffy; Kate Wooldrage
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.106

4.  Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Reena V Chokshi; Christine E Hovis; Graham A Colditz; Dayna S Early; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Knowledge of Polyp History and Recommended Follow-Up Among a Predominately African American Patient Population and the Impact of Patient Navigation.

Authors:  Cassandra Fritz; Keith Naylor; Karen Kim
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-09-03

Review 6.  Colonoscopy quality: metrics and implementation.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Predictors of colorectal polyp recurrence after the first polypectomy in private practice settings: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jean-François Viel; Jean-Marie Studer; Yves Ottignon; Jean-Pierre Hirsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening--review of literature.

Authors:  Sri Rapuri; Jeanne Spencer; Dennis Eckels
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Long-term colorectal cancer incidence after adenoma removal and the effects of surveillance on incidence: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Emma C Robbins; Kevin Pack; Iain Stenson; Paula L Kirby; Bhavita Patel; Matthew D Rutter; Andrew M Veitch; Brian P Saunders; Stephen W Duffy; Kate Wooldrage
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 23.059

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.