Literature DB >> 19526412

Colorectal cancer knowledge is not associated with screening compliance or intention.

David S Weinberg1, Suzanne Miller, Michelle Rodoletz, Brian Egleston, Linda Fleisher, Joanne Buzaglo, Eileen Keenan, Jaime Marks, Eric Bieber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a public health goal. We hypothesized that non-compliant, average risk women would demonstrate low levels of CRC knowledge and underestimate their CRC risk.
METHODS: Participants identified prior to routine gynecological visits completed a survey assessing demographics, CRC knowledge, risk perception, and screening intention.
RESULTS: The 318 participants demonstrated high levels of CRC knowledge. The majority estimated their risk incorrectly and had no intention of screening participation in the future. There were no consistent relationships between knowledge, risk perception, and screening intent.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge alone is an inadequate stimulus of screening adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19526412      PMCID: PMC2724589          DOI: 10.1080/08858190902924815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  35 in total

1.  In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente; J C Norcross
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1992-09

2.  Modifying attributions of colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Celette Sugg Skinner; La Sonya G Green; John Dement; Gregory P Samsa; David Ransohoff
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  An abbreviated version of the Miller Behavioral Style Scale.

Authors:  A Steptoe
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1989-05

4.  Maximizing compliance with hemoccult screening for colon cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  R S Thompson; M E Michnich; J Gray; L Friedlander; B Gilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  A survey of women regarding factors affecting colorectal cancer screening compliance.

Authors:  David S Weinberg; Barbara J Turner; Hao Wang; Ronald E Myers; Suzanne Miller
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Trevor Thompson; Jean A Shapiro; Sally W Vernon; Ralph J Coates
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Knowledge of colorectal cancer among older persons.

Authors:  S P Weinrich; M C Weinrich; M D Boyd; E Johnson; M Frank-Stromborg
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.

Authors:  M Horowitz; N Wilner; W Alvarez
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.312

View more
  9 in total

1.  Attitudes to colorectal cancer screening after reading the prevention information.

Authors:  Chiung-Ju Liu; Tara Fleck; Joan Goldfarb; Casey Green; Elizabeth Porter
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-02

3.  Physician recommendation and patient adherence for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Shawna V Hudson; Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Karissa A Hahn; Eric K Shaw; Jennifer Hemler; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicola J Hall; Greg P Rubin; Christina Dobson; David Weller; Jane Wardle; Mary Ritchie; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Knowledge and attitudes of primary healthcare patients regarding population-based screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Maria Ramos; Maria Llagostera; Magdalena Esteva; Elena Cabeza; Xavier Cantero; Manel Segarra; Maria Martín-Rabadán; Guillem Artigues; Maties Torrent; Joana Maria Taltavull; Joana Maria Vanrell; Mercè Marzo; Joan Llobera
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  General practitioners' knowledge and concern about electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Pia Veldt Larsen; Bernd Kowall
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Predictors of colonoscopy use one year after colonoscopy: prospective study of surveillance behavior for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Toshiatsu Taniguchi; Kei Hirai; Ryoko Sumi; Noriyuki Hayashi; Kazuhisa Maeda; Toshinori Ito
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2014-03-06

8.  Decision Support and the Effectiveness of Web-based Delivery and Information Tailoring for Bowel Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Ingrid H Flight; Carlene J Wilson; Ian T Zajac; Elizabeth Hart; Jane A McGillivray
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2012-09-26

9.  Gender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Paul Ritvo; Ronald E Myers; Lawrence Paszat; Mardie Serenity; Daniel F Perez; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.