Literature DB >> 30489201

Impact of Patient Gender and Race and Physician Communication on Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Visits in Primary Care.

Heather L Rogers1,2, Levent Dumenci3, Ronald M Epstein4, Laura A Siminoff3.   

Abstract

Background: Patient gender and race, and physician-patient communication are associated with clinical outcomes. Aim: To understand the role of these factors in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) during primary care visits as measured by appropriate outcome. Materials and
Methods: Caucasian and African American unannounced standardized patients (USPs) of both genders presented to 207 primary care physicians (PCPs) from community and academic practices in Ohio and Virginia as new patients with CRC symptoms. PCPs were blinded to the diagnosis. Physician subjects consented to audiotaping the encounter. Medical records were obtained. Communication elements were coded by trained observers and appropriate visit outcomes were coded from the medical record and audiofiles, defined as (1) recommendation for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy/fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or (2) referral to gastroenterologist.
Results: A total of 141 of 367 USP visits (38%) resulted in appropriate clinical outcomes. Patient race was not associated with outcome, but being a male USP was (χ2 = 4.12, p = 0.04). Relational communication was represented as a latent variable with seven indicators (alpha = 0.84) and was independently associated with outcome (beta = 0.15; p = 0.025). After controlling for clustered sampling, relational communication, and race, structural equational modeling indicated that female USPs were less likely to have an appropriate clinical visit outcome (beta = -0.13; p = 0.033). Conclusions: Using a novel and innovative methodology capturing PCP behaviors during real-time clinician-patient interaction, appropriate clinical outcome was independently associated with being male and PCP relational communication factors such as encouraging patient communication, being engaged and expressive in the physician-patient conversation, and appearing friendly and sincere. There are persistent biases in the delivery of health care to female patients and further research into targeted communication skills programs may be warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; patient gender; physician–patient communication; primary health care; relational communication; unannounced standardized patient

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30489201      PMCID: PMC6537478          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  33 in total

Review 1.  Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials.

Authors:  Simon J Griffin; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Marijcke W M Veltman; Susan Gillard; Julie Grant; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Differences in colorectal carcinoma stage and survival by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  Chloe Chien; Libby M Morimoto; Jamie Tom; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Patient-physician communication in oncology: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Walter F Baile; Joann Aaron
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  Physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening by race, ethnicity, and health insurance status among men and women in the United States, 2000.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Trevor Thompson
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2005-10

5.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.

Authors:  J W Peabody; J Luck; P Glassman; T R Dresselhaus; M Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Communication styles in the cancer consultation: preferences for a patient-centred approach.

Authors:  S M Dowsett; J L Saul; P N Butow; S M Dunn; M J Boyer; R Findlow; J Dunsmore
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Doctor-patient communication patterns in breast cancer adjuvant therapy discussions.

Authors:  Laura A. Siminoff; Peter Ravdin; Natalie Colabianchi; Christina M. Saunders Sturm
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of effectiveness.

Authors:  Marjolein Gysels; Alison Richardson; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in a population-based study: the impact of gender, health care source, and time.

Authors:  M L Slattery; A Y Kinney; T R Levin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Sociodemographic factors and delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: analysis of data from the "National Survey of NHS Patients: Cancer".

Authors:  R D Neal; V L Allgar
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  "I pretty much followed the law, and there weren't any decisions to make": A qualitative study of self-advocacy experiences of men with cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Hagan Thomas; Makenna L Hadley; Marci Lee Nilsen
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Physician-patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns.

Authors:  Brad N Greenwood; Rachel R Hardeman; Laura Huang; Aaron Sojourner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  How do colorectal cancer patients rate their GP: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Tania Blackmore; Lynne Chepulis; Rawiri Keenan; Jacquie Kidd; Tim Stokes; David Weller; Jon Emery; Ross Lawrenson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Role of primary care physician factors on diagnostic testing and referral decisions for symptoms of possible cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Victoria Hardy; Adelaide Yue; Stephanie Archer; Samuel William David Merriel; Matthew Thompson; Jon Emery; Juliet Usher-Smith; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Negotiating bodily sensations between patients and GPs in the context of standardized cancer patient pathways - an observational study in primary care.

Authors:  Cecilia Hultstrand; Anna-Britt Coe; Mikael Lilja; Senada Hajdarevic
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.