Literature DB >> 9509147

Interactions of spatial frequency and unequal monocular contrasts in stereopsis.

L K Cormack1, S B Stevenson, D D Landers.   

Abstract

Increasing the contrast of just one eye's image degrades stereothresholds; this phenomenon is referred to as the stereo contrast paradox. In experiment one, this paradox was found to be absent in dynamic random-element stereograms; thresholds were simply limited by the lower of the two eyes' contrasts. In experiment two, in which narrowband Gabor targets were used, the paradox was found to be strongest at relatively low spatial frequencies (1 cycle deg-1). As spatial frequency was increased, the paradox gradually disappeared. At relatively high spatial frequencies (5 cycles deg-1), thresholds were generally limited by the lower of the two eyes' contrasts, as was found for the dynamic noise targets. These results demonstrate the interactions of spatial frequency and contrast in binocular image combination and yield clues as to the different roles which high and low spatial frequencies may play in stereopsis.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9509147     DOI: 10.1068/p261121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  18 in total

1.  Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: monocular versus binocular mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Truchard; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Systematic misestimation in a vernier task arising from contrast mismatch.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Barry B Lee; Rigmor C Baraas
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Rebalancing binocular vision in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Interocular correlation sensitivity and its relationship with stereopsis.

Authors:  Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Austin Roorda; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Tiffanie T Yu; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Binocular function during unequal monocular input.

Authors:  Taekjun Kim; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Deficient binocular combination reveals mechanisms of anisometropic amblyopia: signal attenuation and interocular inhibition.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Farshad Moradi; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.