Literature DB >> 24417338

Rebalancing binocular vision in amblyopia.

Jian Ding1, Dennis M Levi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Humans with amblyopia have an asymmetry in binocular vision: neural signals from the amblyopic eye are suppressed in the cortex by the fellow eye. The purpose of this study was to develop new models and methods for rebalancing this asymmetric binocular vision by manipulating the contrast and luminance in the two eyes.
METHODS: We measured the perceived phase of a cyclopean sinewave by asking normal and amblyopic observers to indicate the apparent location (phase) of the dark trough in the horizontal cyclopean sine wave relative to a black horizontal reference line, and used the same stimuli to measure perceived contrast by matching the binocular combined contrast to a standard contrast presented to one eye. We varied both the relative contrast and luminance of the two eyes' inputs, in order to rebalance the asymmetric binocular vision.
RESULTS: Amblyopic binocular vision becomes more and more asymmetric the higher the stimulus contrast or spatial frequency. Reanalysing our previous data, we found that, at a given spatial frequency, the binocular asymmetry could be described by a log-linear formula with two parameters, one for the maximum asymmetry and one for the rate at which the binocular system becomes asymmetric as the contrast increases. Our new data demonstrates that reducing the dominant eye's mean luminance reduces its suppression of the non-dominant eye, and therefore rebalances the asymmetric binocular vision.
CONCLUSIONS: While the binocular asymmetry in amblyopic vision can be rebalanced by manipulating the relative contrast or luminance of the two eyes at a given spatial frequency and contrast, it is very difficult or even impossible to rebalance the asymmetry for all visual conditions. Nonetheless, wearing a neutral density filter before the dominant eye (or increasing the mean luminance in the non-dominant eye) may be more beneficial than the traditional method of patching the dominant eye for treating amblyopia.
© 2014 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2014 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amblyopia treatment; binocular asymmetry; gain control; imbalanced vision; interocular suppression; neutral density filter

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24417338      PMCID: PMC4072503          DOI: 10.1111/opo.12115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  41 in total

1.  Contrast in complex images.

Authors:  E Peli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: effects on stereopsis and fusion.

Authors:  C Schor; T Heckmann
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The time course of interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects.

Authors:  S de Belsunce; R Sireteanu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Binocular integration of contrast information in amblyopia.

Authors:  R A Harrad; R F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Interactions of spatial frequency and unequal monocular contrasts in stereopsis.

Authors:  L K Cormack; S B Stevenson; D D Landers
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  How contrast affects stereoacuity.

Authors:  D L Halpern; R R Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects: the effect of unilateral attenuation with neutral density filters.

Authors:  U Leonards; R Sireteanu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07

8.  Penalization versus part-time occlusion and binocular outcome in treatment of strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  K Simons; K C Gotzler; S Vitale
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Contemporary issues in amblyopia treatment.

Authors:  Robert P Rutstein
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2005-10

10.  The efficacy of optical and pharmacological penalization.

Authors:  M X Repka; J M Ray
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  22 in total

1.  An action video game for the treatment of amblyopia in children: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Christina Gambacorta; Mor Nahum; Indu Vedamurthy; Jessica Bayliss; Josh Jordan; Daphne Bavelier; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Understanding the development of amblyopia using macaque monkey models.

Authors:  Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; David C Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Asymmetric Dichoptic Masking in Visual Cortex of Amblyopic Macaque Monkeys.

Authors:  Christopher Shooner; Luke E Hallum; Romesh D Kumbhani; Virginia García-Marín; Jenna G Kelly; Najib J Majaj; J Anthony Movshon; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Amblyopia Affects the ON Visual Pathway More than the OFF.

Authors:  Carmen Pons; Jianzhong Jin; Reece Mazade; Mitchell Dul; Qasim Zaidi; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Binocular combination of luminance profiles.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Excitatory Contribution to Binocular Interactions in Human Visual Cortex Is Reduced in Strabismic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Chuan Hou 侯川; Terence L Tyson; Ismet J Uner; Spero C Nicholas; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A dichoptic custom-made action video game as a treatment for adult amblyopia.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; Mor Nahum; Samuel J Huang; Frank Zheng; Jessica Bayliss; Daphne Bavelier; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Rethinking amblyopia 2020.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  The Importance of the Interaction Between Ocular Motor Function and Vision During Human Infancy.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.