Literature DB >> 18321401

Systematic misestimation in a vernier task arising from contrast mismatch.

Hao Sun1, Barry B Lee, Rigmor C Baraas.   

Abstract

Luminance signals mediated by the magnocellular (MC) pathway play an important role in vernier tasks. MC ganglion cells show a phase advance in their responses to sinusoidal stimuli with increasing contrast due to contrast gain control mechanisms. If the phase information in MC ganglion cell responses were utilized by central mechanisms in vernier tasks, one might expect systematic errors caused by the phase advance. This systematic error may contribute to the contrast paradox phenomenon, where vernier performance deteriorates, rather than improves, when only one of the target pair increases in contrast. Vernier psychometric functions for a pair of gratings of mismatched contrast were measured to seek such misestimation. In associated electrophysiological experiments, MC and parvocellular (PC) ganglion cells' responses to similar stimuli were measured to provide a physiological reference. The psychophysical experiments show that a high-contrast grating is perceived as phase advanced in the drift direction compared to a low-contrast grating, especially at a high drift rate (8 Hz). The size of the phase advance was comparable to that seen in MC cells under similar stimulus conditions. These results are consistent with the MC pathway supporting vernier performance with achromatic gratings. The shifts in vernier psychometric functions were negligible for pairs of chromatic gratings under the conditions tested here, consistent with the lack of phase advance both in responses of PC ganglion cells and in frequency-doubled chromatic responses of MC ganglion cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18321401      PMCID: PMC2630391          DOI: 10.1017/S0952523808080188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  23 in total

1.  Human speed perception is contrast dependent.

Authors:  L S Stone; P Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: effects on stereopsis and fusion.

Authors:  C Schor; T Heckmann
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Stereopsis and contrast.

Authors:  G E Legge; Y C Gu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Contrast gain control in the primate retina: P cells are not X-like, some M cells are.

Authors:  E A Benardete; E Kaplan; B W Knight
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Sensitivity of macaque retinal ganglion cells to chromatic and luminance flicker.

Authors:  B B Lee; P R Martin; A Valberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Effects of contrast and spatial frequency on vernier acuity.

Authors:  A Bradley; B C Skottun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  How contrast affects stereoacuity.

Authors:  D L Halpern; R R Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor.

Authors:  V Virsu; J Rovamo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Positional acuity with chromatic stimuli.

Authors:  M J Morgan; T S Aiba
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The contrast gain control of the cat retina.

Authors:  R Shapley; J D Victor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  1 in total

1.  Eye movements and the neural basis of context effects on visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Robert Ennis; Dingcai Cao; Barry B Lee; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.