Literature DB >> 9504272

Steady-state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brain stem response.

G Rance1, R C Dowell, F W Rickards, D E Beer, G M Clark.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: 1) To examine the distribution of behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children who had shown no click-evoked auditory brain stem response (ABR) at maximum presentation levels. 2) To describe the relationship between the 90 Hz steady-state evoked potential (SSEP) and behavioral thresholds in these subjects.
DESIGN: A retrospective study based on clinical findings obtained from 108 infants and young children. Each of these children had shown no recordable ABR to clicks presented at maximum levels (100 dB nHL). SSEP audiograms were obtained using AM/FM tones at the octave frequencies 250 to 4000 Hz. The results of these evoked potential assessments were compared with hearing thresholds established behaviorally.
RESULTS: Click-ABR assessment could not differentiate between the subjects in our sample with total hearing losses and those with useful residual hearing. Although some of the ears were anacusic, more than a quarter showed residual hearing at each of the audiometric frequencies. Furthermore, at least 10% of the behavioral thresholds at each frequency fell within the moderate/severe hearing loss range. A far closer relationship was observed between SSEP and hearing thresholds. On occasions where the SSEP was absent at maximum levels, 99.5% of the ears showed either a total loss or a behavioral threshold within 10 dB of that level. When an SSEP was obtained, the hearing threshold was typically within 5 dB of the SSEP threshold.
CONCLUSION: The results suggested that in our group of selected subjects, the SSEP technique was able to assess ears with only minimal amounts of residual hearing. Where the brevity of the acoustic click limits both its frequency specificity and its presentation level, the modulated tones used for SSEP testing allow accurate, frequency-specific assessment at high presentation levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9504272     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  21 in total

1.  Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia M Dierking; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Carol Manning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  [Auditory steady-state response. On the threshold of clinical usage?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  Stefan Rampp; Leonhard Rensch; Sebastian Simmermacher; Torsten Rahne; Christian Strauss; Julian Prell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Comparison between audiometric and ABR thresholds in children. Contradictory findings.

Authors:  Timo I Marttila; Jukka O Karikoski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Auditory steady-state responses for estimating moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Hettie Erasmus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Ali Ozdek; Mahmut Karacay; Guleser Saylam; Emel Tatar; Nurdan Aygener; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Free-Field Cortical Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Razieh Alemi; Sylvie Nozaradan; Alexandre Lehmann
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 8.  Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences.

Authors:  Gary Rance
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

9.  An exploratory look at pediatric cochlear implantation: is earliest always best?

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Reliability of Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR): Comparing Thresholds of Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) with Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) in Children with Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Tolga Kandogan; Abdullah Dalgic
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.