Literature DB >> 16328402

Comparison between audiometric and ABR thresholds in children. Contradictory findings.

Timo I Marttila1, Jukka O Karikoski.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to predict hearing level thresholds with click-evoked ABR and to study the residual hearing when ABR was absent. In 85 hearing-impaired children, the conclusive pure-tone hearing level thresholds are reported. The exclusion criterion used was deteriorating hearing loss. The Jewett V-wave was identified in 48.2% of the subjects and was bilaterally absent in 51.8%. The correlation between ABR and PTA (2-4 kHz) thresholds was significant (P < 0.01). Audiometrically, 65.9% of the children with no response on ABR had hearing, and in 34.5% of these, the hearing loss was sloping. The median PTA (2-4 kHz) was 102 dB and the range from 65 to 120 dB. The accuracy of ABR is reasonably ineffective, because it overestimates the hearing loss in moderate and severe impairments. The absence of ABR indicates a significant hearing loss, but PTAs (2-4 kHz) as good as 65 dB were still found. Thus, a lack of response to click stimuli does not directly suggest none-viable residual hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328402     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-005-1019-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  19 in total

1.  Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.

Authors:  S C Purdy; J M Houghton; W J Keith; K A Greville
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1989

2.  Filtered speech audiometry. I. Basic studies with Finnish speech towards the creation of a method for the diagnosis of central hearing disorders.

Authors:  A Palva
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1965

3.  The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  J F van der Drift; M P Brocaar; G A van Zanten
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1987

4.  A comparison of auditory brain stem response thresholds and latencies elicited by air- and bone-conducted stimuli.

Authors:  M P Gorga; J R Kaminski; K L Beauchaine; B M Bergman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Long-term speech spectra. A computerized method of measurement and a comparative study of Finnish and English data.

Authors:  H J Kiukaanniemi; P Mattila
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1980

6.  The auditory steady-state response: comparisons with the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Barbara Cone-Wesson; Richard C Dowell; Dani Tomlin; Gary Rance; Wu Jia Ming
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Y S Sininger; C Abdala; B Cone-Wesson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Hearing threshold investigations in infants and children.

Authors:  R Sasama
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1990

9.  Prediction of sensorineural hearing level from the brain stem evoked response.

Authors:  J Jerger; L Mauldin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-08

10.  Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  D R Stapells; J S Gravel; B A Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  4 in total

1.  The auditory brainstem responses in patients with unilateral cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  M Sinan Yilmaz; Mehmet Guven; Suleyman Cesur; Haldun Oguz
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-12-04

2.  Cochlear implantation after bacterial meningitis in infants younger than 9 months.

Authors:  B Y Roukema; M C Van Loon; C Smits; C F Smit; S T Goverts; P Merkus; E F Hensen
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-20

3.  Early definition of type, degree and audiogram shape in childhood hearing impairment.

Authors:  G Conti; R Gallus; A R Fetoni; B M Martina; E Muzzi; E Orzan; G Bastanza
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  COMPARISON OF HEARING THRESHOLD ESTIMATION USING AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSES AND BRAINSTEM AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  Slobodanka Lemajić-Komazec; Zoran Komazec; Maja Buljčik Čupić; Saša Knežević; Oliver Vajs
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.780

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.