Literature DB >> 22398961

Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon's selection needed?

Sandra C Donkervoort1, Lea M Dijksman, Lincey C F de Nes, Pieter G Versluis, Joris Derksen, Michael F Gerhards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for conversion in cholecystectomy may be of clinical value. This study aimed to investigate whether a set of risk factors, including the surgeon's specialization, can be used for the development of a preoperative strategy to optimize conversion outcome.
METHODS: The data for all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a single institution between January 2004 and December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Factors predictive for conversion were identified, and a preoperative strategy model was deduced.
RESULTS: Of the 1,126 patients analyzed, 106 (9%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an emergency setting. Delayed surgery was performed for 63 (46%) of 138 patients (12%) with acute cholecystitis. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was achieved for 161 of the patients (14%). Risk factors predictive of conversion (for 65 patients) were male gender [odds ratio (OR), 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-3.9; p = 0.004], age older than 65 years (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4-4.8; p = 0.002), body mass index (BMI) exceeding 25 kg/m(2) (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1; p < 0.001), history of complicated biliary disease (HCBD) (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 3.2-9.8; p = < 0.001), and surgery by a non-gastrointestinal (non-GI) surgeon (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.2-10.6; p < 0.001). The conversion rate for patients with a history of no complications who had two or more risk factors (gender, age, BMI > 25) and for patients with a HCBD who had one or more risk factors was significantly higher if the surgery was performed by non-GI rather than GI surgeons.
CONCLUSION: Male gender, age older than 65 years, BMI exceeding 25 kg/m(2), HCBD, and surgery by a non-GI surgeon are predictive for conversion. A preoperative triage for surgeon selection based on risk factors and a HCBD is proposed to optimize conversion outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22398961     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2189-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  34 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  C F Chandler; J S Lane; P Ferguson; J E Thompson; S W Ashley
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sarli; Domenico R Iusco; Luigi Roncoroni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Consent and complications: risk disclosure varies widely between individual surgeons.

Authors:  P L McManus; K E Wheatley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 5.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  K S Gurusamy; K Samraj
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

6.  Who should perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A 10-year audit.

Authors:  A P Boddy; J M H Bennett; S Ranka; M Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly.

Authors:  L M Brunt; M A Quasebarth; D L Dunnegan; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; O van Ruler; L M Dijksman; A A van Geloven; E G Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Management of acute gallbladder disease in England.

Authors:  G G David; A A Al-Sarira; S Willmott; M Deakin; D J Corless; J P Slavin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18
View more
  8 in total

1.  Is the male gender an independent risk factor for complication in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis?

Authors:  Peter C Ambe; Lothar Köhler
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

2.  Predictors of prolonged laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of low-grade acute cholecystitis: a single-center, retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  Tadashi Kaneko; Taichi Kuwahara; Toshio Harada; Toru Kawaoka; Sakurao Hiraki; Shintaro Fukuda
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2015-01-08

3.  The effect of surgical strategy in difficult cholecystectomy cases on postoperative complications outcome: a value-based healthcare comparative study.

Authors:  K Cremer; F W H Kloppenberg; J W Vanhommerig; L M Dijksman; N Bode; S C Donkervoort
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Anticipation of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prediction of individual outcome.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; K Kortram; L M Dijksman; M A Boermeester; B van Ramshorst; D Boerma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Surgeon's volume is not associated with complication outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Pieter G Versluis; Emile A Clous; Anco C Vahl
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  TOTAL COST OF HOSPITALIZATION OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY RELATED TO NUTRITIONAL STATUS.

Authors:  Francisco Julimar Correia de Menezes; Lara Gadelha Luna de Menezes; Guilherme Pinheiro Ferreira da Silva; Antônio Aldo Melo-Filho; Daniel Hardy Melo; Carlos Antonio Bruno da Silva
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  Optimum timing of emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in England: population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Tom Wiggins; Sheraz R Markar; Hugh MacKenzie; Omar Faiz; Dipankar Mukherjee; David E Khoo; Sanjay Purkayastha; Ian Beckingham; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Evaluation of the conversion rate as it relates to preoperative risk factors and surgeon experience: a retrospective study of 4013 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Szabolcs Ábrahám; Tibor Németh; Ria Benkő; Mária Matuz; Dániel Váczi; Illés Tóth; Aurél Ottlakán; László Andrási; János Tajti; Viktor Kovács; József Pieler; László Libor; Attila Paszt; Zsolt Simonka; György Lázár
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.