Literature DB >> 9474733

Use of the exercise treadmill to measure baseline functional status and surgical outcome in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis.

H G Deen1, R S Zimmerman, M K Lyons, M C McPhee, J L Verheijde, S M Lemens.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study of exercise tolerance on the treadmill before and after decompressive laminectomy in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treadmill testing provides useful information about baseline functional status and surgical outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Historically, criteria for selecting patients for surgery and assessing postoperative outcome have been variable. Functional testing has not been used in a systematic fashion.
METHODS: Fifty patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis underwent decompressive laminectomy. Preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, functional capacity was assessed on an exercise treadmill. Time to first symptoms and total ambulation time were recorded. The examination was stopped at the onset of severe symptoms or after 15 minutes.
RESULTS: In the preoperative trial, mean time to first symptoms (+/- standard deviation) was 1.82 minutes (median, 0.58), and mean total ambulation time was 6.91 minutes (median, 5.22). In the postoperative trial, mean time to first symptoms increased to 11.93 minutes (median, 15) and mean total ambulation time increased to 13.26 minutes (median, 15). There was significant improvement after surgery in both time to first symptoms (P < 0.001) and total ambulation time (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Exercise stress testing on a treadmill is a safe, easily administered, and quantifiable means of assessing baseline functional status and surgical outcome in patients with neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Treadmill testing provides objective evidence that surgery is beneficial in most cases and is helpful in guiding subsequent management of patients with residual symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474733     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment.

Authors:  Hasan Oğuz; Funda Levendoğlu; Tunç Cevat Oğün; Aysenur Tantuğ
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Is the sedimentation sign associated with spinal stenosis surgical treatment effect in SPORT?

Authors:  Rachel A Moses; Wenyan Zhao; Lukas P Staub; Markus Melloh; Thomas Barz; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas Staub; Christoph Roeder; Jörn Lange; Franz-Georg Smiszek; Jean-Claude Theis; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls.

Authors:  Christy C Tomkins-Lane; Sara Christensen Holz; Karen S Yamakawa; Vaishali V Phalke; Doug J Quint; Jennifer Miner; Andrew J Haig
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Comparison between walking test and treadmill test for intermittent claudication associated with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Shinji Tanishima; Satoru Fukada; Hiroyuki Ishii; Toshiyuki Dokai; Yasuo Morio; Hideki Nagashima
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis--a comparative study.

Authors:  James Rainville; Lisa A Childs; Enrique B Peña; Pradeep Suri; Janet C Limke; Cristin Jouve; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 7.  Gait behaviors as an objective surgical outcome in low back disorders: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nima Toosizadeh; Tzu Chuan Yen; Carol Howe; Michael Dohm; Jane Mohler; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 8.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

9.  Step activity monitoring in lumbar stenosis patients undergoing decompressive surgery.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Tim Schubert; Corinna Winter; Mirko Brandes; Lars Hackenberg; Hansdetlef Wassmann; Dennis Liem; Dieter Rosenbaum; Viola Bullmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Eun-Su Moon; Hak-Sun Kim; Jin-Oh Park; Dong-Eun Shin; Jung-Won Ha; Dong-Jun Shim; Yoon-Hae Kwak; Kwang-Il Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.