Literature DB >> 17273837

Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment.

Hasan Oğuz1, Funda Levendoğlu, Tunç Cevat Oğün, Aysenur Tantuğ.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the correlation between neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) in LSS and different positions as well as loading status, using the treadmill device. The study was a prospective clinical trial on lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using a treadmill equipment. The study population comprised of 80 LSS patients with a mean age of 61. The equipment included a treadmill, unloading station and loading vests. The patients were instructed to walk in five different positions. The initiation time of symptoms and total walking time were recorded. The examination was stopped after 20 min or at the onset of severe symptoms. In order to obtain pretest demographic data on subjects, visual analog scale, Roland-Morris questionnaire, pain disability index, and Beck depression index were used. The initiation time of symptoms (ITS) and total walking time (TWT) were measured during the test. Unloading provided a longer and loading a shorter ITS and TWT. Decline or incline positions did not affect ITS or TWT. The changes in posture had no correlation with the appearance of symptoms in LSS patients with NIC on a treadmill in this study, rather ITS and TWT were determined by axial loading and unloading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17273837      PMCID: PMC2219665          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0317-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Walking and cycling tests in neurogenic and intermittent claudication.

Authors:  G Dong; R W Porter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A nonsurgical treatment approach for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J M Fritz; R E Erhard; M Vignovic
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-09

3.  Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features.

Authors:  T Amundsen; H Weber; F Lilleås; H J Nordal; M Abdelnoor; B Magnaes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Analysis of operated cases with lumbar renal stenosis.

Authors:  K E Johnsson; S Willner; H Pettersson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981-08

5.  Test-retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  H G Deen; R S Zimmerman; M K Lyons; M C McPhee; J L Verheijde; S M Lemens
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Preliminary results of the use of a two-stage treadmill test as a clinical diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J M Fritz; R E Erhard; A Delitto; W C Welch; P E Nowakowski
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-10

7.  Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  J Willén; B Danielson; A Gaulitz; T Niklason; N Schönström; T Hansson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Treadmill ambulation with partial body weight support for the treatment of low back and leg pain.

Authors:  David Joffe; Mary Watkins; Linda Steiner; Bernard A Pfeifer
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy. A dynamic CT-myelographic study.

Authors:  L Penning; J T Wilmink
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients.

Authors:  M Grönblad; M Hupli; P Wennerstrand; E Järvinen; A Lukinmaa; J P Kouri; E O Karaharju
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.442

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?

Authors:  H Ozawa; H Kanno; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; T Kusakabe; Y Ishii; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  [Treatment of dynamic spinal canal stenosis with an interspinous spacer].

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Rudolf Beisse; H Michael Mayer; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 3.  Efficacy and characteristics of physiotherapy interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Federico Temporiti; Silvano Ferrari; Michael Kieser; Roberto Gatti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.721

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.