Nima Toosizadeh1, Tzu Chuan Yen2, Carol Howe3, Michael Dohm4, Jane Mohler5, Bijan Najafi6. 1. interdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP) and Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. 2. Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. 3. Arizona Health Sciences Library, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. 5. interdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP) and Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA; Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. 6. interdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP) and Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA; Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. Electronic address: bnajafi@surgery.arizona.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Objective motor performance measures, especially gait assessment, could improve evaluation of low back disorder surgeries. However, no study has compared the relative effectiveness of gait parameters for assessing motor performance in low back disorders after surgery. The purpose of the current review was to determine the sensitive gait parameters that address physical improvements in each specific spinal disorder after surgical intervention. METHODS: Articles were searched with the following inclusion criteria: 1) population studied consisted of individuals with low back disorders requiring surgery; 2) low back disorder was measured objectively using gait assessment tests pre- and post-surgery. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using Delphi consensus, and meta-analysis was performed to compare pre- and post-surgical changes. FINDINGS: Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria, which, almost exclusively, addressed two types of spinal disorders/interventions: 1) scoliosis/spinal fusion; and 2) stenosis/decompression. For patients with scoliosis, improvements in hip and shoulder motion (effect size=0.32-1.58), energy expenditure (effect size=0.59-1.18), and activity symmetry of upper-body muscles during gait were present after spinal fusion. For patients with spinal stenosis, increases in gait speed, stride length, cadence, symmetry, walking smoothness, and walking endurance (effect size=0.60-2.50), and decrease in gait variability (effect size=1.45) were observed after decompression surgery. INTERPRETATION: For patients with scoliosis, gait improvements can be better assessed by measuring upper-body motion and EMG rather than the lower extremities. For patients with spinal stenosis, motor performance improvements can be captured by measuring walking spatio-temporal parameters, gait patterns, and walking endurance.
BACKGROUND: Objective motor performance measures, especially gait assessment, could improve evaluation of low back disorder surgeries. However, no study has compared the relative effectiveness of gait parameters for assessing motor performance in low back disorders after surgery. The purpose of the current review was to determine the sensitive gait parameters that address physical improvements in each specific spinal disorder after surgical intervention. METHODS: Articles were searched with the following inclusion criteria: 1) population studied consisted of individuals with low back disorders requiring surgery; 2) low back disorder was measured objectively using gait assessment tests pre- and post-surgery. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using Delphi consensus, and meta-analysis was performed to compare pre- and post-surgical changes. FINDINGS: Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria, which, almost exclusively, addressed two types of spinal disorders/interventions: 1) scoliosis/spinal fusion; and 2) stenosis/decompression. For patients with scoliosis, improvements in hip and shoulder motion (effect size=0.32-1.58), energy expenditure (effect size=0.59-1.18), and activity symmetry of upper-body muscles during gait were present after spinal fusion. For patients with spinal stenosis, increases in gait speed, stride length, cadence, symmetry, walking smoothness, and walking endurance (effect size=0.60-2.50), and decrease in gait variability (effect size=1.45) were observed after decompression surgery. INTERPRETATION: For patients with scoliosis, gait improvements can be better assessed by measuring upper-body motion and EMG rather than the lower extremities. For patients with spinal stenosis, motor performance improvements can be captured by measuring walking spatio-temporal parameters, gait patterns, and walking endurance.
Authors: Saud M Al-Obaidi; Baker Al-Zoabi; Nadia Al-Shuwaie; Najeeba Al-Zaabie; Roger M Nelson Journal: Int J Rehabil Res Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: Callum Betteridge; Ralph J Mobbs; R Dineth Fonseka; Pragadesh Natarajan; Daniel Ho; Wen Jie Choy; Luke W Sy; Nina Pell Journal: J Spine Surg Date: 2021-09
Authors: S Kimberly Byrnes; Corina Nüesch; Stefan Loske; Andrea Leuenberger; Stefan Schären; Cordula Netzer; Annegret Mündermann Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 4.566