Literature DB >> 9465755

Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems.

H J Kock1, M Pietsch, U Krause, H Wilke, F W Eigler.   

Abstract

Totally implantable venous access systems are widely used, but large-scale studies evaluating these systems are lacking. In this study 1500 patients (719 male, 781 female) with an average age of 49 years (15-86 years) were fitted with subcutaneously implanted venous access systems, in most cases for long-term chemotherapy. All patients were observed until removal of the system, death, or the end of treatment. A retrospective analysis showed an average catheter life of 284 patient-days. A total of 1308 (87%) of the patients had no implant-related complications. Catheter infections occurred in 3.2% of the patients and catheter thromboses in 2.5%. Rarer complications, such as catheter malfunction, migration of the catheter, skin necrosis, catheter fracture, catheter disconnection, and pneumothorax, occurred in another 4.3% of the patients. The complications led to explantation of 178 access systems (11.9%). There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the low rate of infections and other complications in the group of patients with solid tumors (2% and 4%, respectively) and the rate in patients with hematologic diseases (6% and 8%, respectively). This study confirms the safety and convenience of using totally implantable venous access systems in patients on long-term chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9465755     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  76 in total

1.  Port-a-cath embolisation to pulmonary artery.

Authors:  Vijaya Raj Bhatt; Shilpi Gupta; Joseph Lowry; Meekoo Dhar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-07-20

2.  Totally implantable venous power ports of the forearm and the chest: initial clinical experience with port devices approved for high-pressure injections.

Authors:  J P Goltz; C Noack; B Petritsch; J Kirchner; D Hahn; R Kickuth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Disconnection of chamber and catheter as a complication of central venous catheter type port-a-cath.

Authors:  S Kostic; V Kovcin; M Granić; D Jevdic; N Stanisavljevic
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf K M Teichgräber; Stephan Kausche; Sebastian N Nagel; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Atypical pulmonary embolism of port catheter fragments in oncology patients.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Karin Jordan; Michael Buerke; Monica Persing; Bettina Wollschlaeger; Curd Behrmann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Endovascular technique using a snare and suture for retrieving a migrated peripherally inserted central catheter in the left pulmonary artery.

Authors:  Hiroki Teragawa; Takashi Sueda; Yuichi Fujii; Hiroaki Takemoto; Yasushi Toyota; Shuichi Nomura; Keigo Nakagawa
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-26

7.  Femoral placement of totally implantable venous power ports as an alternative implantation site for patients with central vein occlusions.

Authors:  Jan P Goltz; Hendrik Janssen; Bernhard Petritsch; Ralph Kickuth
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Administration of chemotherapy via the median cubital vein without implantable central venous access ports: port-free chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Yoichiro Yoshida; Seiichiro Hoshino; Naoya Aisu; Masayasu Naito; Syu Tanimura; Ai Mogi; Toshihiro Tanaka; Keiji Hirata; Kazuo Tamura; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Comparison of Central Venous Port Procedures Between Puncture vs. Cut-down and Residents vs. Senior Surgeons.

Authors:  Ryota Otsubo; Hiroshi Yano; Megumi Matsumoto; Aya Tanaka; Takashi Nonaka; Shigekazu Hidaka; Keitaro Matsumoto; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Shuntaro Sato; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 10.  Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.