Literature DB >> 33622921

Comparison of Central Venous Port Procedures Between Puncture vs. Cut-down and Residents vs. Senior Surgeons.

Ryota Otsubo1, Hiroshi Yano2, Megumi Matsumoto2, Aya Tanaka2, Takashi Nonaka2, Shigekazu Hidaka2, Keitaro Matsumoto2, Tomoshi Tsuchiya2, Shuntaro Sato3, Takeshi Nagayasu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare operative results between venous puncture (P) with real-time ultrasonography vs. cut-down (CD) with preoperative ultrasonography for totally implantable central vein access device (TICVAD) implantation performed by residents (R) vs. senior surgeons (S). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult oncologic patients (n=268) undergoing TICVAD implantations were retrospectively compared between 172 Ps and 96 CDs. Then, we compared Ps performed by R (P-R, n=131) and S (P-S, n=41) and CDs performed by R (CD-R, n=59) and S (CD-S, n=37).
RESULTS: Median operation times were 40 min in the P group and 53.5 min in the CD group, and times were significantly shorter for P-S and CD-S. Completion rates were comparable for each method and each surgeon. Intraoperative complication rates were 3.8% (P-R), 2.4% (P-S), and 0% (CD-R and CD-S).
CONCLUSION: P with real-time ultrasonography did not avoid complications compared to CD with preoperative ultrasonography. The latter performed safely even by residents. Copyright
© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Punctures; education; implantable catheters; residency; venous cutdown

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622921      PMCID: PMC8045093          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of totally implantable central venous access devices with the cephalic vein cut-down approach: Usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography.

Authors:  Ryota Otsubo; Toshiko Hatachi; Kenichiro Shibata; Takuya Yoshida; Hironosuke Watanabe; Masahiro Oikawa; Megumi Matsumoto; Hiroshi Yano; Hideki Taniguchi; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases.

Authors:  H M Chang; C B Hsieh; H F Hsieh; T W Chen; C J Chen; D C Chan; J C Yu; Y C Liu; K L Shen
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.

Authors:  Lisa K Jablon; Katie R Ugolini; Nissin C Nahmias
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems.

Authors:  H J Kock; M Pietsch; U Krause; H Wilke; F W Eigler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Ultrasound-guided vein puncture versus surgical cut-down technique in totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADS): a prospective comparative study on safety, efficacy andcomplications.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cavallaro; Alessandro Sanguinetti; Olga Iorio; Giuseppe D'Ermo; Andrea Polistena; Nicola Avenia; Gianfranco Silecchia; Giorgio De Toma
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

6.  The Safety Level of Total Central Venous Access Port Implantation Performed by Residents.

Authors:  Teresa Schreckenbach; Indra Münch; Hanan El Youzouri; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Nils Habbe
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  R Biffi; F Orsi; S Pozzi; U Pace; G Bonomo; L Monfardini; P Della Vigna; N Rotmensz; D Radice; M G Zampino; N Fazio; F de Braud; B Andreoni; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Central venous port system-related complications in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Soichi Tsutsumi; Takaharu Fukasawa; Takaaki Fujii; Yuichi Tabe; Wakako Kigure; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2012-06

9.  Cephalic Vein Cut-down for Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices With Preoperative Ultrasonography by Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Shintaro Hashimoto; Ryota Otsubo; Masahiro Adachi; Ryoichiro Doi; Kenichiro Shibata; Isao Sano; Yoshihito Shibata; Takayuki Nakazaki; Hideki Taniguchi; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Closed cannulation of subclavian vein vs open cut-down of cephalic vein for totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) implantation: protocol for a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Kathrin Grummich; Katrin Jensen; Daniel Saure; Pietro Contin; Felix J Hüttner; Markus K Diener; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.