Literature DB >> 18458909

Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.

Pierre-Yves Marcy1.   

Abstract

Long lines can be inserted centrally or peripherally through patent veins into the central venous system down to the atrial caval junction. Traditionally surgeons, anesthetists, cardiologists and more recently interventional radiologists have been placing them using vein cutdown or percutaneous needle puncture techniques. Typical candidates for implanted venous catheters are cancer patients undergoing long-term chemotherapy. The most important issues, in addition to the patency of central veins and the history of previous indwelling catheters, pacewires or venous thrombosis, are the patient's performance status, body mass index, medical history and respiratory status, and the relevant technique. The present article will give an overview of the radiological and surgical implantation techniques and will highlight the impact of imaging means on the technical feasibility, assessment and treatment of device-related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18458909     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0981-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  62 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients.

Authors:  R D Lyon; K A Griggs; A M Johnson; J R Olsen
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Ultrasound-guided cannulation versus the landmark-guided technique for acute haemodialysis access.

Authors:  J Farrell; M Gellens
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.

Authors:  R Biffi; F de Braud; F Orsi; S Pozzi; S Mauri; A Goldhirsch; F Nolè; B Andreoni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Comparison of complications between transjugular and axillosubclavian approach for placement of tunneled, central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Lee; Seong Tai Hahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Tunneled infusion catheters: increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access.

Authors:  S O Trerotola; J Kuhn-Fulton; M S Johnson; H Shah; W T Ambrosius; P H Kneebone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Endovascular treatment of superior vena cava obstruction in patients with malignancies.

Authors:  F Thony; D Moro; P Witmeyer; S Angiolini; C Brambilla; M Coulomb; G Ferretti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  R E Schwarz; J S Groeger; D G Coit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Is radiologic placement of an arm port mandatory in oncology patients?: analysis of a large bi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy; Nicolas Magné; Pierre Castadot; Antoine Italiano; Nicolas Amoretti; Cédric Bailet; Franck Bentolila; Jean-Claude Gallard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Vardy; K Engelhardt; K Cox; J Jacquet; A McDade; M Boyer; P Beale; M Stockler; R Loneragan; B Dennien; R Waugh; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  External jugular vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in cancer patients: A potentially useful alternative.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  13 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor re: "Outcome analysis in 3160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems": observations about right internal jugular access.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy; Alexis Lacout; Andrea Figl; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Arm port implantation in cancer patients.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy; Andrea Figl; Nicolas Amoretti; Antoine Ianessi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Computed tomography as a problem solving tool in non-radiopaque central venous port systems - A report of three cases.

Authors:  Johannes Gossner
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2014-03-14

4.  Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications: a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Masanobu Takahashi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Choosing the appropriate side for subcutaneous port catheter placement in patients with mastectomy: ipsilateral or contralateral?

Authors:  Omer Fatih Nas; Kadir Hacikurt; Ahmet Kaya; Nurullah Dogan; Bekir Sanal; Guven Ozkaya; Halit Ziya Dundar; Cuneyt Erdogan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  A model to assess the risk of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related thrombosis in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Si-Yi Peng; Tao Wei; Xu-Ying Li; Zhong Yuan; Qin Lin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Peripherally inserted central catheter placement in cancer patients with profound thrombocytopaenia: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Julien Potet; Alphonse Thome; Emmanuel Curis; François-Xavier Arnaud; Gabrielle Weber-Donat; Laura Valbousquet; Evelyne Peroux; Eric Flor; Christophe Dody; Johanna Konopacki; Jean Valère Malfuson; Cecile Cartry; Marion Lahutte; Thierry de Revel; Jacques Baccialone; Christophe A Teriitehau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  PICC-PORT: Valid indication to placement in patient with results of extensive skin burns of the neck and chest in oncology. The first case in the scientific literature.

Authors:  D Merlicco; M Lombardi; M C Fino
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-19

9.  Malposition of peripherally inserted central catheter: Experience from 3,012 patients with cancer.

Authors:  Linping Song; Hui Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Power port contrast medium flushing and trapping: impact of temperature, an in vitro experimental study.

Authors:  Gérard Guiffant; Jean Jacques Durussel; Patrice Flaud; Laurent Royon; Pierre Yves Marcy; Jacques Merckx
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2013-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.