Literature DB >> 9428814

Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.

P M Rao1, J T Rhea, R A Novelline, A A Mostafavi, C J McCabe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with clinically suspected appendicitis, computed tomography (CT) is diagnostically accurate. However, the effect of routine CT of the appendix on the treatment of such patients and the use of hospital resources is unknown.
METHODS: We performed appendiceal CT on 100 consecutive patients in the emergency department who, on the basis of history, physical examination, and laboratory results, were to be hospitalized for observation for suspected appendicitis or for urgent appendectomy. Outcomes were determined at surgery and by pathological examination in 59 patients, and by clinical follow-up two months later in 41 patients. Treatment plans made before CT were compared with the patients' actual treatment. We also determined the costs of surgery that revealed no appendicitis (from data on 61 patients), one day of observation in the hospital (from data on 350 patient-days in patients with suspected appendicitis), and appendiceal CT (from data on all pelvic CT examinations in 1996).
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had appendicitis, and 47 did not. The interpretations of the appendiceal CT scans were 98 percent accurate. The results of CT led to changes in the treatment of 59 patients. These changes resulted in the prevention of unnecessary appendectomy in 13 patients, admission to the hospital for observation in 18 patients, admission to the hospital for observation before necessary appendectomy in 21 patients, and admission to the hospital for observation before the diagnosis of other conditions by CT in 11 patients. The effects of performing appendiceal CT on the use of hospital resources included the prevention of unnecessary appendectomy in 13 patients (for a savings of $47,281) and the prevention of unnecessary hospital admission for 50 patient-days (for a savings of $20,250). After the cost of 100 appendiceal CT studies ($22,800) was subtracted, the overall savings was $447 per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine appendiceal CT performed in patients who present with suspected appendicitis improves patient care and reduces the use of hospital resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9428814     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199801153380301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  96 in total

1.  Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996.

Authors:  P G Blomqvist; R E Andersson; F Granath; M P Lambe; A R Ekbom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Can perforated appendicitis Be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors?

Authors:  D Oliak; D Yamini; V M Udani; R J Lewis; H Vargas; T Arnell; M J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Impact of journal articles and grand rounds on practice: CT scanning in appendicitis.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Elizabeth Wako; Jennifer Fergestaad; Merril Dayton
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy.

Authors:  A C van Breda Vriesman; B J Kole; J B C M Puylaert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Routine ultrasound and limited computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Roland E Andersson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Impact of AITS laparoscopic training center on surgeons' preference for appendectomy.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai; Shih-Horng Tseng; Yueh-Tsung Lee; Chih-Hung Hsu; Dev-Aur Chou; Hurng-Sheng Wu; Min-Ho Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate--clinical experience in 525 cases.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giuliano; Concetta Giuliano; Fabio Pinto; Mariano Scaglione
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-06-03

8.  A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nikolaos E Tzanakis; Stamatis P Efstathiou; Kecaris Danulidis; Georgios E Rallis; Dimitrios I Tsioulos; Anthimos Chatzivasiliou; Georgios Peros; Nikolaos I Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Adrienne van Randen; Wytze Laméris; C Yung Nio; Anje M Spijkerboer; Mark A Meier; Charlotte Tutein Nolthenius; Frank Smithuis; Patrick M Bossuyt; Marja A Boermeester; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  US examination of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: the additional value of secondary signs.

Authors:  Fraukje Wiersma; Boudewijn R Toorenvliet; Johan L Bloem; Jan Hein Allema; Herma C Holscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.