Literature DB >> 16088420

A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Nikolaos E Tzanakis1, Stamatis P Efstathiou, Kecaris Danulidis, Georgios E Rallis, Dimitrios I Tsioulos, Anthimos Chatzivasiliou, Georgios Peros, Nikolaos I Nikiteas.   

Abstract

This study aimed (1) to develop a simple scoring system incorporating ultrasound (US) examination and clinical or laboratory predictors for increasing diagnostic accuracy in acute appendicitis (AA), and (2) to evaluate the performance of the scoring system as compared to that of previous models. Fifteen variables including US assessment for patients admitted with suspected AA were considered in multivariate analysis using the finding of AA at operation as the end point (internal study). The new score, together with 11 previous ones, was applied to a prospective independent population of subjects with suspected AA, and the respective performances were compared (external validation study). Among 303 patients (170 males, mean age 28.3 +/- 13.3 years) of the internal study, 161 went on to surgery, and 130 had AA at operation. Four independent correlates of AA were identified and used for the derivation of the following integer-based scoring system: number of points = 6 for US demonstrating AA + 4 for tenderness in the right lower quadrant + 3 for rebound tenderness + 2 for leukocyte count >12,000/microl. In the external study (201 subjects, 105 males, mean age 28.7 +/- 11.9 years, 109 operated, 87 with AA), when the cut-off of >/or = 8 points for AA was used, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of the proposed score were 95.4%, 97.4%, 96.5%, and 93%, respectively, exceeding noticeably the previous models. The proposed scoring system introduces a quantitative combination of the clinical evaluation with US imaging and a marker of inflammatory response, which may enhance the diagnostic accuracy for subjects with suspected AA especially in geographical areas where CT scanning is not readily available on a 24-hour basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16088420     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7853-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  35 in total

1.  A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A Alvarado
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S L Lee; A J Walsh; H S Ho
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-05

3.  Value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: interesting aspects.

Authors:  R Obermaier; S Benz; M Asgharnia; R Kirchner; U T Hopt
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 2.175

4.  Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study.

Authors:  M Kalan; D Talbot; W J Cunliffe; A J Rich
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a prospective multicenter trial. Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group.

Authors:  C Franke; H Böhner; Q Yang; C Ohmann; H D Röher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon's clinical impression.

Authors:  D S Wade; S E Marrow; Z N Balsara; T K Burkhard; W B Goff
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-09

7.  [Retro- and prospective studies on the value of clinical and laboratory chemical data in acute appendicitis].

Authors:  J R Izbicki; D K Wilker; H K Mandelkow; K Müller; M Siebeck; K Geissler; L Schweiberer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  R E B Andersson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  [Ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis by surgeons--a matter of experience? A prospective study].

Authors:  M Amgwerd; M Röthlin; D Candinas; R Schimmer; H P Klotz; F Largiadèr
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

10.  A feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis.

Authors:  C W Van Way; J R Murphy; E L Dunn; S C Elerding
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1982-11
View more
  19 in total

1.  Comparison of the levels of accuracy of an artificial neural network model and a logistic regression model for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Shinya Sakai; Kuriko Kobayashi; Shin-ichi Toyabe; Nozomu Mandai; Tatsuo Kanda; Kohei Akazawa
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best?

Authors:  Malsha Kularatna; Melanie Lauti; Cheyaanthan Haran; Wiremu MacFater; Laila Sheikh; Ying Huang; John McCall; Andrew D MacCormick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  An evaluation of the utility of additional tests in the preoperative diagnostics of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Ryszard Anielski; Beata Kuśnierz-Cabala; Krystyna Szafraniec
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Utility of CT after sonography for suspected appendicitis in children: integration of a clinical scoring system with a staged imaging protocol.

Authors:  Abhay Srinivasan; Sabah Servaes; Andrès Peña; Kassa Darge
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-12

5.  The Heidelberg Appendicitis Score Simplifies Identification of Pediatric Appendicitis.

Authors:  Michael Boettcher; Thomas Breil; Patrick Günther
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Leucocyte Count Does Not Improve the Diagnostic Performance of a Diagnostic Score (DS) in Distinguishing Acute Appendicitis (AA) from Nonspecific Abdominal Pain (NSAP).

Authors:  Jannica Meklin; Maaret Eskelinen; Kari Syrjanen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Gender-specific Performance of a Diagnostic Score in Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Jannica Meklin; Maaret Eskelinen; Kari SyrjÄnen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Is hyperbilirubinaemia in appendicitis a better predictor of perforation than C-reactive protein? - a prospective study.

Authors:  Marcelo A Beltran; Pedro E Mendez; Rodrigo E Barrera; Mario A Contreras; Christian S Wilson; Victor J Cortes; Karina S Cruces
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  High mobility group box protein-1 (HMGB-1) as a new diagnostic marker in patients with acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Yavuz Albayrak; Ayse Albayrak; Muhammet Celik; Ibrahim Gelincik; Ismail Demiryılmaz; Rahsan Yildirim; Bunyami Ozogul
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Levels of C-Reactive Protein and Sodium May Differentiate a Perforated Appendix from a Nonperforated Appendix in Children.

Authors:  M Nissen; R-B Tröbs
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.