Literature DB >> 12845461

Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy.

A C van Breda Vriesman1, B J Kole, J B C M Puylaert.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of US and complementary CT in patients with suspected appendicitis, and to detect adverse outcomes of preoperative imaging. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 233 consecutive patients who underwent an appendectomy as an emergency procedure in our hospital, within a 2-year period. Our hospital policy is to perform diagnostic imaging in all patients with clinical suspicion of appendicitis. The US was performed in 227 patients, followed by additional unenhanced helical focused appendiceal CT in 30 patients with equivocal US results. We evaluated the negative appendectomy rate, occurrence of perforation, and our in-hospital delay. Acute appendicitis was pathologically proven in 219 patients, corresponding to a negative appendectomy rate of 6%. The US with optional CT diagnosed appendicitis with a sensitivity of 96.7%. Forty-eight appendices (21.9%) were perforated. The median overall in-hospital delay was 5 h (range 0.5-123.5 h). For the perforated appendices this was 4.5 h (range 0.5-64.5 h), for the non-perforated appendices 6.0 h (range 0.5-123.5 h). In patients with suspected acute appendicitis, US examination with the option of additional CT significantly lowers the negative appendectomy rate as compared with the clinical acumen alone, without adverse effects on the perforation rate or the in-hospital delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12845461     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1939-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance.

Authors:  V Velanovich; R Satava
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.

Authors:  D R Flum; A Morris; T Koepsell; E P Dellinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Appendicitis at the millennium.

Authors:  B A Birnbaum; S R Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S L Lee; A J Walsh; H S Ho
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-05

5.  Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline; A A Mostafavi; C J McCabe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; N M Rofsky; R Zucker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study.

Authors:  C L Temple; S A Huchcroft; W J Temple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis.

Authors:  David R Flum; Thomas Koepsell
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-07

9.  Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.

Authors:  Sandra E Bendeck; Matilde Nino-Murcia; Gerald J Berry; R Brooke Jeffrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Appendicitis: should diagnostic imaging be performed if the clinical presentation is highly suggestive of the disease?

Authors:  Thomas Rettenbacher; Alois Hollerweger; Norbert Gritzmann; Thaddaeus Gotwald; Klaus Schwamberger; Hanno Ulmer; Dieter Zur Nedden
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  22 in total

1.  Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Eric Bergeron
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Pictorial review: magnetic resonance imaging of colonic diverticulitis.

Authors:  Orla Buckley; Tony Geoghegan; Grainne McAuley; Thara Persaud; Faisal Khosa; William C Torreggiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Acute appendicitis: current surgical value of diagnostics and therapy standards].

Authors:  M W Büchler; M N Wente
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Short-term Outcome of Open Appendectomy in Southern Iran: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Shahram Paydar; Parisa Javidi Parsijani; Armin Akbarzadeh; Alireza Manafi; Fariborz Ghaffarpasand; Hamid Reza Abbasi; Shahram Bolandparvaz
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2013-07

Review 5.  Clinical approach to a child with abdominal pain who might have appendicitis.

Authors:  Michael D Klein
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-10-17

6.  Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Alexandra Platon; Thomas De Perrot; Francois Sarasin; Elisabeth Andereggen; Olivier Rutschmann; Elise Dupuis-Lozeron; Thomas Perneger; Pascal Gervaz; Christoph D Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  'To have...or not to have'. Should computed tomography and ultrasonography be implemented as a routine work-up for patients with suspected acute appendicitis in a regional hospital?

Authors:  David T Chiang; Elaine I Tan; David Birks
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Alexandra Platon; Helmi Jlassi; Olivier T Rutschmann; Christoph D Becker; Francis R Verdun; Pascal Gervaz; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  A simple MRI protocol in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis: results in 138 patients and effect on outcome of appendectomy.

Authors:  Lodewijk Cobben; Ingrid Groot; Lucas Kingma; Emile Coerkamp; Julien Puylaert; Johan Blickman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?

Authors:  Gamal Khairy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.