Literature DB >> 11303128

Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996.

P G Blomqvist1, R E Andersson, F Granath, M P Lambe, A R Ekbom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study mortality after appendectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The management of patients with suspected appendicitis remains controversial, with advocates of early surgery as well as of expectant management. Mortality is not known.
METHODS: The authors conducted a complete follow-up of deaths within 30 days after all appendectomies in Sweden (population 8.9 million) during the years 1987 to 1996 (n = 117,424) by register linkage. The case fatality rate (CFR) and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) were analyzed by discharge diagnosis.
RESULTS: The CFR was 2.44 per 1,000 appendectomies. It was strongly related to age (0.31 per 1,000 appendectomies at 0-9 years of age, decreasing to 0.07 at 20-29 years, and reaching 164 among nonagenarians) and diagnosis at surgery (0.8 per 1,000 appendectomies after nonperforated appendicitis, 5.1 after perforated appendicitis, 1.9 after appendectomies for nonsurgical abdominal pain, and 10.0 for those with other diagnoses). The SMR showed a sevenfold excess rate of deaths after appendectomy compared with the general population. The relation to age was less marked (SMR of 44.4 at 0-9 years, decreasing to 2.4 in patients aged 20-29 years. and reaching 8.1 in nonagenarians). The SMR was doubled after perforation compared with nonperforated appendicitis (6.5 and 3.5, respectively). Nonsurgical abdominal pain and other diagnoses were associated with a high excess rate of deaths (9.1 and 14.9, respectively). The most common causes of deaths were appendicitis, ischemic heart diseases and tumors, followed by gastrointestinal diseases.
CONCLUSIONS: The CFR after appendectomy is high in elderly patients. The excess rate of death for patients with nonperforated appendicitis and nonsurgical abdominal pain suggests that the deaths may partly be caused by the surgical trauma. Increased diagnostic efforts rather than urgent appendectomy are therefore warranted among frail patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11303128      PMCID: PMC1421275          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200104000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  25 in total

1.  The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States.

Authors:  D G Addiss; N Shaffer; B S Fowler; R V Tauxe
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Incidence and case fatality rates for acute appendicitis in California. A population-based study of the effects of age.

Authors:  R Luckmann
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  [Appendicitis--change in the disease picture?].

Authors:  C Käufer; I Franz; H J Löblich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  The perforated appendix.

Authors:  R A Malt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Death from appendicitis and appendicectomy. An epidemiological survey.

Authors:  J G Howie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1966-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Appendectomy in the Federal Republic of Germany: epidemiology and medical care patterns.

Authors:  S Lichtner; M Pflanz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1971 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Factors affecting perforation in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  T D Koepsell; T S Inui; V T Farewell
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981-10

8.  Letter: Error-rate factor in the management of appendicitis.

Authors:  E T Jacob; N Bar-Nathan; M Iuchtman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Evolution of the age distribution and mortality of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  P Peltokallio; H Tykkä
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1981-02

Review 10.  Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  J Hoffmann; O O Rasmussen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  66 in total

1.  Sex differences in the epidemiology, seasonal variation, and trends in the management of patients with acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Gideon Y Stein; Lea Rath-Wolfson; Aliza Zeidman; Eli Atar; Ohad Marcus; Samia Joubran; Edward Ram
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Environmental factors associated with Crohn's disease in India.

Authors:  Srinivasan Pugazhendhi; Manoj Kumar Sahu; Venkataraman Subramanian; Anna Pulimood; Balakrishnan S Ramakrishna
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-13

3.  Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Alessandra Buja; Tatjana Baldovin; Giampietro Callegaro; Paolo Sandonà; Domenico Mantoan; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Markides; Daren Subar; Kallingal Riyad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Acute appendicitis in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Pei-Wen Chao; Shuo-Ming Ou; Yung-Tai Chen; Yi-Jung Lee; Feng-Ming Wang; Chia-Jen Liu; Wu-Chang Yang; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Tzen-Wen Chen; Szu-Yuan Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis.

Authors:  Roland E Andersson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Acute appendicitis.

Authors:  D J Humes; J Simpson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-09

8.  Retroperitoneal abscess resulting from perforated acute appendicitis: analysis of its management and outcome.

Authors:  Chi-Hsun Hsieh; Yu-Chun Wang; Horng-Ren Yang; Ping-Kuei Chung; Long-Bin Jeng; Ray-Jade Chen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Risk factors for adverse outcomes after the surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Julie A Margenthaler; Walter E Longo; Katherine S Virgo; Frank E Johnson; Charles A Oprian; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.