Literature DB >> 19234705

Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain.

Adrienne van Randen1, Wytze Laméris, C Yung Nio, Anje M Spijkerboer, Mark A Meier, Charlotte Tutein Nolthenius, Frank Smithuis, Patrick M Bossuyt, Marja A Boermeester, Jaap Stoker.   

Abstract

The level of inter-observer agreement of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in unselected patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the Emergency Department (ED) was evaluated. Two hundred consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain were prospectively included. Multi-slice CT was performed in all patients with intravenous contrast medium only. Three radiologists independently read all CT examinations. They recorded specific radiological features and a final diagnosis on a case record form. We calculated the proportion of agreement and kappa values, for overall, urgent and frequently occurring diagnoses. The mean age of the evaluated patients was 46 years (range 19-94), of which 54% were women. Overall agreement on diagnoses was good, with a median kappa of 0.66. Kappa values for specific urgent diagnoses were excellent, with median kappa values of 0.84, 0.90 and 0.81, for appendicitis, diverticulitis and bowel obstruction, respectively. Abdominal CT has good inter-observer agreement in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain at the ED, with excellent agreement for specific urgent diagnoses as diverticulitis and appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19234705     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1294-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clement T Loy; Les Irwig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  New methods give better estimates of changes in diagnostic accuracy when prior information is provided.

Authors:  Les Irwig; Petra Macaskill; Stephen D Walter; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Acute abdomen: Added diagnostic value of coronal reformations with 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Stephan Zangos; Scott D Steenburg; K Dan Phillips; J Matthias Kerl; Shaun A Nguyen; Christopher Herzog; U Joseph Schoepf; Thomas J Vogl; Phillip Costello
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy.

Authors:  G P McDonald; D P Pendarvis; R Wilmoth; B J Daley
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis.

Authors:  M J Weyant; S R Eachempati; M A Maluccio; D E Rivadeneira; S R Grobmyer; L J Hydo; P S Barie
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT sections in the same patient.

Authors:  D I Weltman; J Yu; J Krumenacker; S Huang; P Moh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline; A A Mostafavi; J N Lawrason; C J McCabe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Suspected acute colon diverticulitis: imaging with low-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Denis Tack; Pascale Bohy; Ingrid Perlot; Viviane De Maertelaer; Orfan Alkeilani; Stavroula Sourtzis; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Caroline Keyzer; Denis Tack; Viviane de Maertelaer; Pascale Bohy; Pierre Alain Gevenois; Daniel Van Gansbeke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Optimization of diagnostic imaging use in patients with acute abdominal pain (OPTIMA): Design and rationale.

Authors:  Wytze Laméris; Adrienne van Randen; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker; Marja A Boermeester
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2007-08-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Abdominal separation in an adult male patient with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Bao-Lin Liu; Yang Chen; Shi-Qing Liu; Xiao-Bo Zhang; Dong-Xu Cui; Xian-Wei Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Relative accuracy of emergency CT in adults with non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Authors:  Helen Perry; Kieran George Foley; Jolene Witherspoon; Anna Powell-Chandler; Tarig Abdelrahman; Ashley Roberts; Wyn G Lewis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Portal phase alone is equivalent to multiphasic phase for CT diagnosis of acute non-traumatic pains in an emergency context.

Authors:  Guillaume Herpe; Samy Boucebci; Tiphaine Cassan; Marine Verdier; Charles Simonet; Guillaume Sztark; Jean Pierre Tasu
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-11-28

4.  Relative CT number of periappendiceal fat stranding may be an applicable index for estimating the severity of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Xinhong Song; Mingqi Shi; Wei Liu; Yansong Ge; Peiyuan Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Adrienne van Randen; Wytze Laméris; H Wouter van Es; Hans P M van Heesewijk; Bert van Ramshorst; Wim Ten Hove; Willem H Bouma; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Esteban M van Keulen; Patrick M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker; Marja A Boermeester
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.