Literature DB >> 9405381

Solution structure of the Mu end DNA-binding ibeta subdomain of phage Mu transposase: modular DNA recognition by two tethered domains.

S Schumacher1, R T Clubb, M Cai, K Mizuuchi, G M Clore, A M Gronenborn.   

Abstract

The phage Mu transposase (MuA) binds to the ends of the Mu genome during the assembly of higher order nucleoprotein complexes. We investigate the structure and function of the MuA end-binding domain (Ibetagamma). The three-dimensional solution structure of the Ibeta subdomain (residues 77-174) has been determined using multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. It comprises five alpha-helices, including a helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motif formed by helices 3 and 4, and can be subdivided into two interacting structural elements. The structure has an elongated disc-like appearance from which protrudes the recognition helix of the HTH motif. The topology of helices 2-4 is very similar to that of helices 1-3 of the previously determined solution structure of the MuA Igamma subdomain and to that of the homeodomain family of HTH DNA-binding proteins. We show that each of the two subdomains binds to one half of the 22 bp recognition sequence, Ibeta to the more conserved Mu end distal half (beta subsite) and Igamma to the Mu end proximal half (gamma subsite) of the consensus Mu end-binding site. The complete Ibetagamma domain binds the recognition sequence with a 100- to 1000-fold higher affinity than the two subdomains independently, indicating a cooperative effect. Our results show that the Mu end DNA-binding domain of MuA has a modular organization, with each module acting on a specific part of the 22 bp binding site. Based on the present binding data and the structures of the Ibeta and Igamma subdomains, a model for the interaction of the complete Ibetagamma domain with DNA is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9405381      PMCID: PMC1170352          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/16.24.7532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  52 in total

1.  Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer.

Authors:  P C Leung; D B Teplow; R M Harshey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Structural domains in phage Mu transposase: identification of the site-specific DNA-binding domain.

Authors:  C Nakayama; D B Teplow; R M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA.

Authors:  M G Surette; S J Buch; G Chaconas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-04-24       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing calculations.

Authors:  M Nilges; G M Clore; A M Gronenborn
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1988-03-14       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu.

Authors:  R Craigie; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-11-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Recombining the structures of HIV integrase, RuvC and RNase H.

Authors:  W Yang; T A Steitz
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein.

Authors:  R Craigie; M Mizuuchi; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The three-dimensional structure of trp repressor.

Authors:  R W Schevitz; Z Otwinowski; A Joachimiak; C L Lawson; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Oct 31-Nov 6       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Primary structure of phage mu transposase: homology to mu repressor.

Authors:  R M Harshey; E D Getzoff; D L Baldwin; J L Miller; G Chaconas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  14 in total

1.  Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites.

Authors:  T L Williams; E L Jackson; A Carritte; T A Baker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  The solution structure of the C-terminal domain of the Mu B transposition protein.

Authors:  L H Hung; G Chaconas; G S Shaw
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The helix-turn-helix motif of bacterial insertion sequence IS911 transposase is required for DNA binding.

Authors:  Philippe Rousseau; Erwan Gueguen; Guy Duval-Valentin; Mick Chandler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  3D reconstruction of the Mu transposase and the Type 1 transpososome: a structural framework for Mu DNA transposition.

Authors:  Joy F Yuan; Daniel R Beniac; George Chaconas; F Peter Ottensmeyer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Specific interaction between the initiator protein (Rep) and origin of plasmid ColE2-P9.

Authors:  M Han; M Yagura; T Itoh
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Altering the DNA-binding specificity of Mu transposase in vitro.

Authors:  S Y Namgoong; S Sankaralingam; R M Harshey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The same two monomers within a MuA tetramer provide the DDE domains for the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition.

Authors:  S Y Namgoong; R M Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  Mechanisms of DNA Transposition.

Authors:  Alison B Hickman; Fred Dyda
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-04

Review 9.  DDE transposases: Structural similarity and diversity.

Authors:  Irina V Nesmelova; Perry B Hackett
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  Deciphering the Roles of Multicomponent Recognition Signals by the AAA+ Unfoldase ClpX.

Authors:  Lorraine Ling; Sherwin P Montaño; Robert T Sauer; Phoebe A Rice; Tania A Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.