Literature DB >> 25797169

Deciphering the Roles of Multicomponent Recognition Signals by the AAA+ Unfoldase ClpX.

Lorraine Ling1, Sherwin P Montaño2, Robert T Sauer1, Phoebe A Rice2, Tania A Baker3.   

Abstract

ATP-dependent protein remodeling and unfolding enzymes are key participants in protein metabolism in all cells. How these often-destructive enzymes specifically recognize target protein complexes is poorly understood. Here, we use the well-studied AAA+ unfoldase-substrate pair, Escherichia coli ClpX and MuA transposase, to address how these powerful enzymes recognize target protein complexes. We demonstrate that the final transposition product, which is a DNA-bound tetramer of MuA, is preferentially recognized over the monomeric apo-protein through its multivalent display of ClpX recognition tags. The important peptide tags include one at the C-terminus ("C-tag") that binds the ClpX pore and a second one (enhancement or "E-tag") that binds the ClpX N-terminal domain. We construct a chimeric protein to interrogate subunit-specific contributions of these tags. Efficient remodeling of MuA tetramers requires ClpX to contact a minimum of three tags (one C-tag and two or more E-tags), and that these tags are contributed by different subunits within the tetramer. The individual recognition peptides bind ClpX weakly (KD>70 μM) but impart a high-affinity interaction (KD~1.0 μM) when combined in the MuA tetramer. When the weak C-tag signal is replaced with a stronger recognition tag, the E-tags become unnecessary and ClpX's preference for the complex over MuA monomers is eliminated. Additionally, because the spatial orientation of the tags is predicted to change during the final step of transposition, this recognition strategy suggests how AAA+ unfoldases specifically distinguish the completed "end-stage" form of a particular complex for the ideal biological outcome.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ClpXP; MuA protein; adaptor protein; chaperone; degron

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25797169      PMCID: PMC4569521          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  63 in total

1.  Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites.

Authors:  T L Williams; E L Jackson; A Carritte; T A Baker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Dynamics of substrate denaturation and translocation by the ClpXP degradation machine.

Authors:  Y I Kim; R E Burton; B M Burton; R T Sauer; T A Baker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  A specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP degradation machine.

Authors:  I Levchenko; M Seidel; R T Sauer; T A Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Structure of a delivery protein for an AAA+ protease in complex with a peptide degradation tag.

Authors:  Igor Levchenko; Robert A Grant; David A Wah; Robert T Sauer; Tania A Baker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Enhancer-independent variants of phage Mu transposase: enhancer-specific stimulation of catalytic activity by a partner transposase.

Authors:  J Y Yang; M Jayaram; R M Harshey
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  ClpX and MuB interact with overlapping regions of Mu transposase: implications for control of the transposition pathway.

Authors:  I Levchenko; M Yamauchi; T A Baker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  The interwoven architecture of the Mu transposase couples DNA synapsis to catalysis.

Authors:  H Aldaz; E Schuster; T A Baker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-04-19       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Solution structure of the I gamma subdomain of the Mu end DNA-binding domain of phage Mu transposase.

Authors:  R T Clubb; S Schumacher; K Mizuuchi; A M Gronenborn; G M Clore
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The μ transpososome structure sheds light on DDE recombinase evolution.

Authors:  Sherwin P Montaño; Ying Z Pigli; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Location of dual sites in E. coli FtsZ important for degradation by ClpXP; one at the C-terminus and one in the disordered linker.

Authors:  Jodi L Camberg; Marissa G Viola; Leslie Rea; Joel R Hoskins; Sue Wickner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Oxidization without substrate unfolding triggers proteolysis of the peroxide-sensor, PerR.

Authors:  Bo-Eun Ahn; Tania A Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  An enhancer sequence in the intrinsically disordered region of FtsZ promotes polymer-guided substrate processing by ClpXP protease.

Authors:  Marissa G Viola; Theodora Myrto Perdikari; Catherine E Trebino; Negar Rahmani; Kaylee L Mathews; Carolina Mejia Pena; Xien Yu Chua; Botai Xuan; Christopher J LaBreck; Nicolas L Fawzi; Jodi L Camberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Lon recognition of the replication initiator DnaA requires a bipartite degron.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Rilee Zeinert; Laura Francis; Peter Chien
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 4.  Mechanistic insights into bacterial AAA+ proteases and protein-remodelling machines.

Authors:  Adrian O Olivares; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Engineered AAA+ proteases reveal principles of proteolysis at the mitochondrial inner membrane.

Authors:  Hui Shi; Anthony J Rampello; Steven E Glynn
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The Protein Chaperone ClpX Targets Native and Non-native Aggregated Substrates for Remodeling, Disassembly, and Degradation with ClpP.

Authors:  Christopher J LaBreck; Shannon May; Marissa G Viola; Joseph Conti; Jodi L Camberg
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2017-05-04

7.  Target DNA bending by the Mu transpososome promotes careful transposition and prevents its reversal.

Authors:  James R Fuller; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Proteolysis-Dependent Remodeling of the Tubulin Homolog FtsZ at the Division Septum in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Marissa G Viola; Christopher J LaBreck; Joseph Conti; Jodi L Camberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mechanistic details of CRISPR-associated transposon recruitment and integration revealed by cryo-EM.

Authors:  Jung-Un Park; Amy Wei-Lun Tsai; Tiffany H Chen; Joseph E Peters; Elizabeth H Kellogg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 12.779

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.