Literature DB >> 9671813

Altering the DNA-binding specificity of Mu transposase in vitro.

S Y Namgoong1, S Sankaralingam, R M Harshey.   

Abstract

We describe the isolation of a variant of Mu transposase (MuA protein) which can recognize altered att sites at the ends of Mu DNA. No prior knowledge of the structure of the DNA binding domain or its mode of interaction with att DNA was necessary to obtain this variant. Protein secondary structure programs initially helped target mutations to predicted helical regions within a subdomain of MuA demonstrated to harbor att DNA binding activity. Of the 54 mutant positions examined, only two showed decreased affinity for att DNA, while eight others affected assembly of the Mu transpososome. A variant impaired in DNA binding [MuA(R146V)], and predicted to be in the recognition helix of an HTH motif, was challenged with altered att sites created from degenerate oligonucleotides to select for novel DNA binding specificity. DNA sequences bound to MuA(R146V) were detected by gel-retardation, and following several steps of PCR amplification/enrichment, were identified by cloning and sequencing. The strategy allowed recovery of an altered att site for which MuA(R146V) showed higher affinity than for the wild-type site, although this site was bound by wild-type MuA as well. The altered association between MuA(R146V) and an altered att site target was competent in transposition. We discuss the strengths and limitations of this methodology, which has applications in dissecting the functional role of specific protein-DNA associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9671813      PMCID: PMC147725          DOI: 10.1093/nar/26.15.3521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  39 in total

1.  Enhancer-independent variants of phage Mu transposase: enhancer-specific stimulation of catalytic activity by a partner transposase.

Authors:  J Y Yang; M Jayaram; R M Harshey
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Phage display methods for selecting zinc finger proteins with novel DNA-binding specificities.

Authors:  E J Rebar; H A Greisman; C O Pabo
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments.

Authors:  C Geourjon; G Deléage
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1995-12

Review 4.  DNA transposition: jumping gene machine, some assembly required.

Authors:  G Chaconas; B D Lavoie; M A Watson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  A tetramer of the Flp recombinase silences the trimers within it during resolution of a Holliday junction substrate.

Authors:  J Lee; M Jayaram
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  The interwoven architecture of the Mu transposase couples DNA synapsis to catalysis.

Authors:  H Aldaz; E Schuster; T A Baker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-04-19       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Mu transpositional recombination: donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer in trans by the Mu transposase.

Authors:  H Savilahti; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-04-19       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Positional information within the Mu transposase tetramer: catalytic contributions of individual monomers.

Authors:  J Y Yang; M Jayaram; R M Harshey
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-05-03       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Assembly and orientation of Flp recombinase active sites on two-, three- and four-armed DNA substrates: implications for a recombination mechanism.

Authors:  J Lee; I Whang; M Jayaram
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  The phage Mu transpososome core: DNA requirements for assembly and function.

Authors:  H Savilahti; P A Rice; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-10-02       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  Domain III function of Mu transposase analysed by directed placement of subunits within the transpososome.

Authors:  S Mariconda; S Y Namgoong; K H Yoon; H Jiang; R M Harshey
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  The AAA+ ClpX machine unfolds a keystone subunit to remodel the Mu transpososome.

Authors:  Aliaa H Abdelhakim; Robert T Sauer; Tania A Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Directed evolution of a recombinase for improved genomic integration at a native human sequence.

Authors:  C R Sclimenti; B Thyagarajan; M P Calos
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Deciphering the Roles of Multicomponent Recognition Signals by the AAA+ Unfoldase ClpX.

Authors:  Lorraine Ling; Sherwin P Montaño; Robert T Sauer; Phoebe A Rice; Tania A Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  The μ transpososome structure sheds light on DDE recombinase evolution.

Authors:  Sherwin P Montaño; Ying Z Pigli; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.