Literature DB >> 9353475

Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access.

B Funaki1, G X Szymski, C A Hackworth, J D Rosenblum, R Burke, T Chang, J A Leef.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The technical success and complications associated with radiologic placement of subcutaneous implantable chest ports for long-term central venous access were evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1, 1996, and December 31, 1996, 80 chest ports were placed in 80 consecutive patients using the right internal jugular vein as the preferred access route. All procedures occurred in interventional radiology suites with patients receiving conscious sedation. Both sonography and fluoroscopy were used for venipuncture and to guide port insertion. Follow-up was obtained by the clinical service and by performing chart reviews electronically.
RESULTS: Technical success was 100%, and follow-up was obtained in all patients. One procedural complication occurred that was unrelated to actual catheter placement. Mean catheter use was 155 days (total, 12,168 days; range, 18-303 days). Confirmed catheter-related infection rate was 3%, or 0.016 per 100 access days; symptomatic catheter-related central venous thrombosis rate was 1%, or 0.008 per 100 access days; and 5% of catheters were removed prematurely. No instances of hematoma formation, catheter tip migration or malposition, symptomatic air embolism, spontaneous catheter fracture, or pneumothorax were found.
CONCLUSION: With the benefit of both sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance, subcutaneous implantable chest ports can be inserted by radiologists with equal or lower complication rates than those reported in surgical series. Image-guided insertion of chest ports should replace rather than supplement unguided placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9353475     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.169.5.9353475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  25 in total

1.  Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf K M Teichgräber; Stephan Kausche; Sebastian N Nagel; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Chest port insertion.

Authors:  Brian Funaki
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Subcutaneous chest port infection.

Authors:  Brian Funaki
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Cost and Morbidity Analysis of Chest Port Insertion: Interventional Radiology Suite Versus Operating Room.

Authors:  Jennifer R LaRoy; Sarah B White; Thejus Jayakrishnan; Stephanie Dybul; Dirk Ungerer; Kiran Turaga; Parag J Patel
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Retrospective outcome analysis of rates and types of complications after 8654 minimally invasive radiological port implantations via the subclavian vein without ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Karolin J Paprottka; Jana Voelklein; Tobias Waggershauser; Maximilian F Reiser; Philipp M Paprottka
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience.

Authors:  Martin Jonczyk; Bernhard Gebauer; Roman Rotzinger; Dirk Schnapauff; Bernd Hamm; Federico Collettini
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  The central vein access port and catheter in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of 101 patients.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sawayama; Naoko Hayashi; Masayuki Watanabe; Hiroshi Takamori; Toru Beppu; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Radiological placement of chest ports in pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  Barbaros E Cil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Junichiro Kawamura; Satoshi Nagayama; Akinari Nomura; Atsushi Itami; Hiroshi Okabe; Seiji Sato; Go Watanabe; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.