Literature DB >> 18704637

Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer.

Junichiro Kawamura1, Satoshi Nagayama, Akinari Nomura, Atsushi Itami, Hiroshi Okabe, Seiji Sato, Go Watanabe, Yoshiharu Sakai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous ports are mandatory for chemotherapy in cancer patients because prolonged infusions are required. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of peripheral arm ports for chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.
METHODS: A peripheral venous access port was placed in the upper arm in 113 consecutive patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). All patients received modified FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil [5-FU]/l-leucovorin [LV]/oxaliplatin [L-OHP]) 6 or FOLFIRI (5-FU/LV/irinotecan hydrochloride [CPT-11]) regimens at least once via the venous access port. All patients were followed up at least once every 2 weeks.
RESULTS: Puncture of the basilic veins was successfully completed under real-time sonographic guidance or radiographic guidance in all patients. The median operative time was 30 min. The cumulative follow-up period was 29 886 catheter days (range, 9-560 days; mean, 264 days). No procedural complications, such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, arterial puncture, or cardiovascular problems, occurred in our series. A total of nine patients (8.0%) had complications. Port-site infection occurred in six patients (5.3%; 0.20 infections per 1000 catheter-days). One patient (0.9%) had an episode of ultrasound-documented deep vein thrombosis in the ipsilateral upper extremity (0.03/1000 catheter-days). Dislocation or migration of the catheter tip occurred in two patients (0.07/1000 catheter-days). A second port was placed in six patients (5.3%) after removal of the fi rst port.
CONCLUSION: Peripheral arm ports can be maintained with excellent short-and long-term outcomes. Peripheral arm ports are considered to be a good alternative to central venous ports implanted in the chest in patients with MCRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18704637     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-008-0766-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  25 in total

Review 1.  Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  S Vescia; A K Baumgärtner; V R Jacobs; M Kiechle-Bahat; A Rody; S Loibl; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.

Authors:  L J Bodner; J L Nosher; K M Patel; R L Siegel; R Biswal; C E Gribbin; R Tokarz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  M L Neuman; B D Murphy; M P Rosen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: current options, current evidence.

Authors:  Hanna Kelly; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Peripheral infusion ports for central venous access in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  M J Cunningham; M B Collins; D C Kredentser; J H Malfetano
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Totally implantable central venous access ports for high-dose chemotherapy administration and autologous stem cell transplantation: analysis of overall and septic complications in 68 cases using a single type of device.

Authors:  R Biffi; G Martinelli; S Pozzi; S Cinieri; E Cocorocchio; F Peccatori; P F Ferrucci; R Pistorio; B Andreoni
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Outcome of 350 implanted chest ports placed by interventional radiologists.

Authors:  P C Shetty; M K Mody; D J Kastan; R P Sharma; M W Burke; C Venugopal; T H Burke
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Radiology-assisted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for long-term venous access.

Authors:  S L Morris; P F Jaques; M A Mauro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Experience with the P.A.S.-PORT venous access device in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  G Deppe; M L Kahn; V K Malviya; J M Malone; C W Christensen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Is radiologic placement of an arm port mandatory in oncology patients?: analysis of a large bi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy; Nicolas Magné; Pierre Castadot; Antoine Italiano; Nicolas Amoretti; Cédric Bailet; Franck Bentolila; Jean-Claude Gallard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  14 in total

1.  Totally implantable venous power ports of the forearm and the chest: initial clinical experience with port devices approved for high-pressure injections.

Authors:  J P Goltz; C Noack; B Petritsch; J Kirchner; D Hahn; R Kickuth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Arm port implantation in cancer patients.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy; Andrea Figl; Nicolas Amoretti; Antoine Ianessi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The central vein access port and catheter in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of 101 patients.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sawayama; Naoko Hayashi; Masayuki Watanabe; Hiroshi Takamori; Toru Beppu; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Short-term and long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of central venous access port devices implanted at the forearm: a retrospective monocenter analysis in 1704 patients.

Authors:  Moritz Wildgruber; Sebastian Borgmeyer; Bernhard Haller; Heike Jansen; Jochen Gaa; Marion Kiechle; Reinhard Meier; Johannes Ettl; Hermann Berger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The duration of functioning of a subcutaneous implantable port for the treatment of hematological tumors: a single institution-based study.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ohno; Chisaki Mizumoto; Yoshihiro Otsuki; Shigeru Oguma; Yataro Yoshida
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Central venous port-related infection in patients with malignant tumors: an observational study.

Authors:  Akio Akahane; Miyuki Sone; Shigeru Ehara; Kenichi Kato; Michiko Suzuki; Ryoichi Tanaka; Akira Suwabe; Tetsuya Itabashi; Kashiwaba Masahiro
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.384

7.  Upper arm central venous port implantation: a 6-year single institutional retrospective analysis and pictorial essay of procedures for insertion.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Yuichi Kakudo; Masanobu Takahashi; Hideki Shimodaira; Shunsuke Kato; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Epidemiology and natural history of central venous access device use and infusion pump function in the NO16966 trial.

Authors:  E Chu; D Haller; T Cartwright; C Twelves; J Cassidy; W Sun; M W Saif; E McKenna; S Lee; H-J Schmoll
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  A retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single institute.

Authors:  Yukiko Mori; Satoshi Nagayama; Jun-Ichiro Kawamura; Suguru Hasegawa; Eiji Tanaka; Hiroshi Okabe; Megumi Takeuchi; Makoto Sonobe; Shigemi Matsumoto; Masashi Kanai; Manabu Muto; Tsutomu Chiba; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients.

Authors:  Yanhong Li; Yonghua Cai; Xiaoqin Gan; Xinmei Ye; Jiayu Ling; Liang Kang; Junwen Ye; Xingwei Zhang; Jianwei Zhang; Yue Cai; Huabin Hu; Meijin Huang; Yanhong Deng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.