Literature DB >> 21516496

Tamsulosin does not have greater efficacy than conventional treatment for distal ureteral stone expulsion in Mexican patients.

Raúl Ochoa-Gómez1, Emilio Prieto-Díaz-Chávez, Benjamín Trujillo-Hernández, Clemente Vásquez.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate tamsulosin (TAM) efficacy in distal ureteral stone expulsion in Mexican patients. A double-blind clinical trial was carried out for a period of 4 weeks on 65 patients assigned to the following treatment groups: Group A, 32 patients receiving conventional treatment + TAM; and Group B, 33 patients receiving conventional treatment + placebo. Patients of both groups were checked every 14 days to evaluate treatment adherence and clinical progression through plain abdominal film and abdominal ultrasonogram. There was no significant difference in stone expulsion percentage between groups: Group A 69% (n = 22) versus Group B 70% (n = 23), P = 0.9. There was no significant difference in mean expulsion time comparison between groups: Group A 22 ± 6.7 days (11-30 days interval) versus Group B 23 ± 6.3 days (11-30 days interval), P = 0.3. Tamsulosin did not demonstrate greater efficacy in distal ureteral stone expulsion in Mexican patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21516496     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0380-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  29 in total

1.  Effectiveness of low-dose and standard-dose tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteric stones: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  B Lojanapiwat; W Kochakarn; N Suparatchatpan; K Lertwuttichaikul
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 2.  Tamsulosin: current clinical experience.

Authors:  M P O'Leary
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Effect of tamsulosin on the number and intensity of ureteral colic in patients with lower ureteral calculus.

Authors:  Sefa Resim; Hasan Ekerbicer; Ahmet Ciftci
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Natural history and current concepts for the treatment of small ureteral calculi.

Authors:  W A Hübner; P Irby; M L Stoller
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Effectiveness of nifedipine and deflazacort in the management of distal ureter stones.

Authors:  F Porpiglia; P Destefanis; C Fiori; D Fontana
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Evidence for the presence of alpha1 adrenoceptor subtypes in the human ureter.

Authors:  Sandra Sigala; Marco Dellabella; Giulio Milanese; Sara Fornari; Stefania Faccoli; Francesca Palazzolo; Angelo Peroni; Giuseppe Mirabella; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; PierFranco Spano; Giovanni Muzzonigro
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Efficacy of tamsulosin in the medical management of juxtavesical ureteral stones.

Authors:  Marco Dellabella; Giulio Milanese; Giovanni Muzzonigro
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Hermanns; Peter Sauermann; Kaspar Rufibach; Thomas Frauenfelder; Tullio Sulser; Räto T Strebel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Efficacy of tamsulosin in the management of lower ureteral stones: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 100 patients.

Authors:  Abdulla Al-Ansari; Abdulla Al-Naimi; Abdulkader Alobaidy; Khalid Assadiq; Mohamed D Azmi; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones.

Authors:  Thijs Campschroer; Xiaoye Zhu; Robin Wm Vernooij; Mtw Tycho Lock
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-05

Review 2.  Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; Benjamin K Canales; Mary A M Rogers; Shyam Sukumar; Phyllis Yan; Gretchen M Kuntz; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Is tamsulosin effective for the passage of symptomatic ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Guo-Lin Lei; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei; Xin Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Effect of Flos carthami Extract and α 1-Adrenergic Antagonists on the Porcine Proximal Ureteral Peristalsis.

Authors:  San-Yuan Wu; Kee-Ming Man; Jui-Lung Shen; Huey-Yi Chen; Chiao-Hui Chang; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Wen-Tsong Hsieh; Daniel Winardi; Yuan-Ju Lee; Kao-Sung Tsai; Yu-Ning Lin; Yung-Hsiang Chen; Wen-Chi Chen
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 5.  Medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones: Analysing the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysis of powered double-blinded randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Tarik Amer; Banan Osman; Allan Johnstone; Martin Mariappan; Ameet Gupta; Nikolaos Brattis; Gareth Jones; Bhaskar K Somani; Francis X Keeley; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-04-18

Review 6.  Comparison of efficacy of three commonly used alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gopal Sharma; Tarun Pareek; Pawan Kaundal; Shantanu Tyagi; Saket Singh; Thummala Yashaswi; Sudheer Kumar Devan; Aditya Prakash Sharma
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.