Literature DB >> 21960371

Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study.

Stavros Sfoungaristos1, Nikolaos Polimeros, Adamantios Kavouras, Petros Perimenis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the need for pre-treatment stenting in patients undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral stones sized 4-10 mm.
METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted between September 2009 and March 2011. Included 156 patients randomized in stented and non-stented groups and underwent a maximum of 3 ESWL sessions. Radiographic follow-up was used to assess the stone fragmentation and clearance. Results were compared in terms of stone-free rates, post-treatment morbidity and complications.
RESULTS: Overall efficacy was 76.9%. Stone-free rates were statistically significantly lower (P = 0.026) in the stented group (68.6%) compared to the non-stented ones (83.7%). Furthermore, stenting was significantly correlated with post-treatment lower urinary tract symptoms (P ≤ 0.001), need for more ESWL sessions (P = 0.019) and possibility for operation due to ESWL failure (P = 0.026). A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify the parameters which may predict complete stone removal after ESWL. Stone size (P = 0.026), stone location (P = 0.011) and stenting (P = 0.007) were the most significant factors.
CONCLUSIONS: ESWL is an efficient and safe treatment for 4- to 10-mm ureteral stones. Pre-treatment stenting is limiting stone-free rates and is significantly influencing post-ESWL morbidity and quality of life in a negative manner, while it contributes minimally to the prophylaxis of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21960371     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-011-0062-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  13 in total

Review 1.  The management of ureteric stones. Part II: therapy.

Authors:  H N Whitfield
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Mingqing Wang; Qiduo Shi; Xuguang Wang; Kun Yang; Rui Yang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-18

3.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi: results with a third-generation lithotripter.

Authors:  V J Gnanapragasam; P D Ramsden; L S Murthy; D J Thomas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Prediction of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteric stones.

Authors:  Muwafak Salman; Abdulla A Al-Ansari; Raidh A Talib; El-Fadil El-Malik; Issam A Al-Bozaom; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdel-Khalek; Khaled Sheir; Emad Elsobky; Saied Showkey; Mahmoud Kenawy
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003

7.  Is pre-shock wave lithotripsy stenting necessary for ureteral stones with moderate or severe hydronephrosis?

Authors:  Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Hosni K Salem
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques.

Authors:  Islam A Ghoneim; Mohamed N El-Ghoneimy; Ashraf E El-Naggar; Khaled M Hammoud; Mohamed Y El-Gammal; Ahmed A Morsi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of middle ureteral stones: are ureteral stents necessary?

Authors:  S Y Nakada; M S Pearle; J J Soble; S M Gardner; B L McClennan; R V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  13 in total

1.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Cross-sectional imaging of iatrogenic complications after extracorporeal and endourological treatment of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Federica Villa; Sonia Ippolito; Alessandra Pagani; Roberto Bianco
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-09-26

5.  Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Krystian Kaczmarek; Adam Gołąb; Marcin Słojewski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2016-04-08

6.  Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.

Authors:  Dong Hyuk Kang; Kang Su Cho; Won Sik Ham; Doo Yong Chung; Jong Kyou Kwon; Young Deuk Choi; Joo Yong Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-10-24

7.  Can a brief period of double J stenting improve the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi sized 1 to 2 cm?

Authors:  Rakesh Sharma; Arpan Choudhary; Ranjit Kumar Das; Supriya Basu; Ranjan Kumar Dey; Rupesh Gupta; Partha Pratim Deb
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-02-15

Review 8.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: What is new?

Authors:  Christian Bach; Theocharis Karaolides; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-05-24

9.  Is there a place for ESWL in the treatment of complicated proximal ureteral stones?

Authors:  Ewa Bres-Niewada
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2013

10.  Does ureteral stenting matter for stone size? A retrospectıve analyses of 1361 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients.

Authors:  Burak Ozkan; Cagatay Dogan; Gulce Ecem Can; Nejat Tansu; Ahmet Erozencı; Bulent Onal
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.