Literature DB >> 22665926

Evaluation of the sensitivity of scout radiographs on unenhanced helical CT in identifying ureteric calculi: a large UK tertiary referral centre experience.

W W Yap1, J C Belfield, P Bhatnagar, S Kennish, T M Wah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Unenhanced helical CT for kidney, ureter and bladder (CT KUB) has become the standard investigation for renal colic. This study aims to determine the sensitivity of scout radiographs in detecting ureteric calculi using CT KUB as a standard reference.
METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who presented with acute flank pain and were investigated using CT KUB. 201 patients with positive ureteric calculi were included. Two radiologists independently reviewed the scout radiographs with access to CT KUB images. Each observer recorded the presence or absence of calculi, location, size and mean Hounsfield units of each calculus.
RESULTS: 203 ureteric calculi were analysed from 201 patients. The overall sensitivity of scout radiographs for Observer A was 42.3% and for Observer B 52.2%, with an interobserver reliability κ-value of 0.78. The significance of mean Hounsfield units and size between two groups of patients with visible stones and those not visible were tested; the p-value for both variables was <0.0001, which is statistically significant. The study found that calculi in the upper ureter and larger than 4 mm are more likely to be seen on the scout radiograph.
CONCLUSIONS: Usage of CT scout radiography should be encouraged and reported routinely in conjunction with CT KUB as a baseline for treatment follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22665926      PMCID: PMC3474095          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/64356303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  14 in total

1.  Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent.

Authors:  W Liu; S J Esler; B J Kenny; R H Goh; A J Rainbow; G W Stevenson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  Deirdre M Coll; Michael J Varanelli; Robert C Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; F Desgrandschamps; F Terrier
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Can computed tomography scout radiography replace plain film in the evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?

Authors:  G Ege; H Akman; K Kuzucu; S Yildiz
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  J A Levine; J Neitlich; M Verga; N Dalrymple; R C Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Sensitivity of CT scout radiography and abdominal radiography for revealing ureteral calculi on helical CT: implications for radiologic follow-up.

Authors:  Z Assi; J F Platt; I R Francis; R H Cohan; M Korobkin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Comparison of kidney-ureter-bladder abdominal radiography and computed tomography scout films for identifying renal calculi.

Authors:  Richard Johnston; Anthony Lin; Jason Du; Stephen Mark
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  R C Smith; M Verga; S McCarthy; A T Rosenfield
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus.

Authors:  Eric P Tamm; Paul M Silverman; William P Shuman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Use of computed tomography scout film and Hounsfield unit of computed tomography scan in predicting the radio-opacity of urinary calculi in plain kidney, ureter and bladder radiographs.

Authors:  Michael E Chua; Odina R Gomez; Lorelei D Sapno; Steve L Lim; Marcelino L Morales
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2014-07

2.  Kidney stones and imaging: what can your radiologist do for you?

Authors:  Raphaële Renard-Penna; Aurélie Martin; Pierre Conort; Pierre Mozer; Philippe Grenier
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The value of X-ray digital tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of urinary calculi.

Authors:  Shifeng Liu; Hong Wang; Weihua Feng; Xiaokun Hu; Jian Guo; Qingjun Shang; Zixiang Li; Hongsheng Yu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Scout view in pediatric CT neuroradiological evaluation: do not underestimate!

Authors:  Gunes Orman; Thangamadhan Bosemani; Aylin Tekes; Andrea Poretti; Thierry A G M Huisman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 1.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.