Literature DB >> 7217120

Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee.

R D Scott, R F Santore.   

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee replacement is an attractive concept that offers several potential advantages over bicompartmental or tricompartmental replacement, including preservation of bone stock, of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, of the patellofemoral joint, and of the normal opposite compartment. Of our first 100 consecutive knees that had unicompartmental arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and were followed for two to six years (average, three and one-half years), eighty-eight were medial and twelve were lateral replacements. The ages of the patients at the time of operation ranged from forty-six to eighty-five years, with an average age of seventy-one years. At follow-up, pain relief was good to excellent in 92 per cent of the knees. The average amount of flexion was 114 degrees (range, 90 to 140 degrees); one-half of the knees had at least 120 degrees of flexion. The average flexion contracture was 1 degree. There were no infections and no peroneal palsies. At the time of writing, three failures had required revision. Radiolucent lines at the bone-cement interface were present around 8 per cent of the femoral components and 27 per cent of the tibial components. Two femoral components subsided in obese patients. There was no tibial loosening in the series. The most common complications, per anserinus bursitis, occurred in 12 per cent of the knees and was treated satisfactorily by injection of local anesthetics and steroids. Surgical technique must be precise to prevent subluxation of the tibia on the femur due to either improper positioning of the components or too tight a fit (too much pressure) between them. We view unicompartmental replacement as an attractive alternative for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis in elderly patients. However, we are strong advocates of proximal tibial osteotomy for unicompartmental osteoarthritis associated with a varus deformity in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7217120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  26 in total

1.  [Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Keim
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Lateral uni-compartmental knee replacement: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  E Servien; A Merini; S Lustig; P Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [The causes of failures in unicondylar knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  B Maudhuit
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

4.  Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem.

Authors:  S M Hauptmann; P Weber; C Glaser; C Birkenmaier; V Jansson; P E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Which primary total knee replacement? A review of currently available TKR in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Y Liow; D W Murray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Unicompartmental knee replacement: a historical overview.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Ibrahim Akkawi; Michele Gagliardi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2013-10-24

7.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: an Asian perspective.

Authors:  Matthew Dhanaraj Thambiah; Sahaya Nathan; Branden Z X Seow; Shen Liang; Krishna Lingaraj
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Unicompartmental knee prosthetization: Which key-points to consider?

Authors:  Andrea Emilio Salvi; Anthony Vatroslav Florschutz
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18

9.  [Medial unicondylar knee replacement].

Authors:  O Lorbach; D Pape; P Mosser; D Kohn; K Anagnostakos
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Long-term results of Marmor arthroplasty in varus osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  H Kofoed; C Asmussen; H Lindewald
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.